RECENT  POSTS:  » Maggie Gallagher forfeits right to ever again talk about gay-related 'slippery slopes' » Extremely anti-gay FRC to lecture folks how to 'rightly' respond to 'wrong' SCOTUS decision » This is such a corrosive idea to put out into the world » Audio: Will you please stop 'attacking' NOM president for saying your sexual orientation, family are 'disordered'? » Video: Mike Huckabee, Republican candidate for increased book sells, vows to defy pro-equality SCOTUS ruling » Reliably tacky NOM turns Memorial Day into day of anti-gay politicking » Ireland: Not only a practical win, but also another tremendous psychological shift » Hillary Clinton campaign honors Harvey Milk, LGBTQ rights » You don't have to pounce on every less-than-pro-gay retailer, anti-gay conservatives! » Video: Tony Perkins tells pastors they 'may have five years' before being 'dragged kicking and screaming from your church'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/14/2008

Report: AZ worker fired for being on right side of history

by Jeremy Hooper

Want an example of TRUE persecution on the basis of belief? Oh, and one that comes at the hand of the LDS belief system? Well if so, go read what Jim Burroway has learned:

Employee Fired By LDS-Owned Firm for opposing Prop 102 [Box Turtle Bulletin]

"Banned, fired, & demoralized" vs. "Met with angry reaction from a group of people who are sick of having their civil, civil, civil (did we mention civil?) rights stifled by religion!" You decide who's really getting the raw end of the stick in this post-electoral aftermath!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

JH, the title of the Box Turtle Bulletin piece should say "opposing" rather than "supporting".

Posted by: Dick Mills | Nov 14, 2008 3:29:07 PM

By the way, I got the headline wrong in my rush to publish it. It should read, "Employee fired by LDS-owned Firm for OPPOSING Prop 102"

Posted by: Jim Burroway | Nov 14, 2008 3:45:07 PM

MEMO TO BILL O'REILLY:

THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF BEING TARGETED

Posted by: a. mcewen | Nov 14, 2008 5:26:19 PM

You don't really think O'Reilly will listen, do you a.mcewen?

Posted by: RainbowPhoenix | Nov 14, 2008 5:49:17 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails