RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: America is ready for the freedom to marry » READ: Very anti-gay crew vows to never recognize civil marriage equality (even though they so will or face penalties) » NOM #March4Marriage coalition partner, religious liaison: 'Homosexuality is behavior and choice...immoral' » Mike Huckabee blatantly lies about something no civil marriage activist is seeking » Video: Man who once called for ban on gay teachers promotes #March4Marriage; because of course he does » FRC Senior Fellow: We are prepared to 'give our lives' to fight same-sex marriage (i.e. 'our eternal destruction') » Questions 'Face The Nation' should ask Tony Perkins (but likely won't, sadly) » Gorgeous clip from PFLAG Canada recognizes the many marriage memories that never were » On marriage, FRC prays SCOTUS will 'rule in the fear of the Lord' » AFA's new desperation: Marriage equality will turn bible into 'Mein Kampf'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/14/2008

Report: AZ worker fired for being on right side of history

by Jeremy Hooper

Want an example of TRUE persecution on the basis of belief? Oh, and one that comes at the hand of the LDS belief system? Well if so, go read what Jim Burroway has learned:

Employee Fired By LDS-Owned Firm for opposing Prop 102 [Box Turtle Bulletin]

"Banned, fired, & demoralized" vs. "Met with angry reaction from a group of people who are sick of having their civil, civil, civil (did we mention civil?) rights stifled by religion!" You decide who's really getting the raw end of the stick in this post-electoral aftermath!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

JH, the title of the Box Turtle Bulletin piece should say "opposing" rather than "supporting".

Posted by: Dick Mills | Nov 14, 2008 3:29:07 PM

By the way, I got the headline wrong in my rush to publish it. It should read, "Employee fired by LDS-owned Firm for OPPOSING Prop 102"

Posted by: Jim Burroway | Nov 14, 2008 3:45:07 PM

MEMO TO BILL O'REILLY:

THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF BEING TARGETED

Posted by: a. mcewen | Nov 14, 2008 5:26:19 PM

You don't really think O'Reilly will listen, do you a.mcewen?

Posted by: RainbowPhoenix | Nov 14, 2008 5:49:17 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails