RECENT  POSTS:  » Photo: Stop! Turn around! Don't let NOM force you onto the dead-end pier that is their cause! » One day, two country singers—zero closets » Fringe pro-discrimination group thinks it can stop companies from sponsoring HRC event; adorable » Video: Josh Duggar promoting civil inequality for thousands of grown kids (and counting) » Brian Brown's focus on Kansas, Gov. Brownback shows how much of a political game this is for him » Tiny fraction of North Carolina magistrates choose to free up their days rather than serve local gays » Video: Reality star Josh Duggar leads sad little inequality rally in Little Rock, AR » READ: Federal judge strikes Montana's discriminatory marriage ban » Major global brand P&G comes out for marriage equality » In 2013, HRC went red for equality; NOM just went in the red  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/05/2009

Audio: Mel asks you to 'Go on believe her when she tells you nothing's wrong'

by Jeremy Hooper

Melissa Etheridge is still defending the Rick Warren fiasco, accepting the line about the ceremonial invite being a matter of political bridge-building. This snippet comes from the January 3rd edition of NPR's "All Things Considered" (other speaker is NPR's Guy Raz):





*FULL SEGMENT: Singer Etheridge Defends Obama's Choice Of Warren [NPR]

So he has an excuse for his incset/polygmay/pedophilia comments. And what about all the others, like when he stated that gays should never act upon their realities? What sort of excuse would earn him your pass on that one, Melissa? How far is a preacher allowed to go and still receive a purely ceremonial, non-policy-making invite to this supposedly pro-gay president's celebratory event? And the key question for us: Would a conservative president EVER have extended the same to a gay or even gay-inclusive preacher?

It's easier and more convenient to see this situation as no big deal, and to accept this invite as a peace offering towards the creation of a better world. And that would be true if we were talking about an inclusive policy forum on religious issues. But we are not talking about such an event -- we are talking about the new president's welcoming party. In this instance, it still feels much less like an olive branch and more like a thorny branch smacking us in our queer faces.

(H/t: Towle)

**EARLIER: Mel, we adore you. But... [G-A-Y]
Mel's wife, Tammy Lynn Michaels, also defends Warren [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

She's earnest for sure, but sadly misguided. When did she become our spokesperson?

Posted by: John Ozed | Jan 5, 2009 10:51:10 AM

Yea John, in a way I hate to criticize her because she's clearly so passionate and so desirous of doing the right thing. But in this instance, I find her way off the mark. And it's annoying, because she gets more attention than most of us could ever dream of.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Jan 5, 2009 10:53:57 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails