RECENT  POSTS:  » Conservs serving up military 'meat market' angle; this writer's never been happier to be vegetarian » Video: Who is Handsy McGroper (R-IntoDavidBrooks)? » Maine 'pro-fams' love, love, love state law -- until they don't » Clinton's successor vs. Clinton era policy » Audio: It's got a good beat but you can't fully wretch to it » If rejecting 'ex-gay' therapy is pro-gay activism, then no wonder Pinnocchio never comes to our rallies » A new 'Leif': 40 is the new baby dyke » Mental note: Never hire Randy Thomasson to write our obituaries » Audio: They talk, we transcribe their transgressions » Make your own jokes:  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/06/2009

Barr regrets federal Rose/Ann bar

Authors are often embarrassed by their past works. Those who wrote manuals on how to survive Y2K probably look back with some face-egg. James Frey surely has some regrets about the way he presented A Million Little Pieces. And of course we all know about that late work-belying essay, Shrews Never Need Taming, that a young Billy Shakespeare wrote as an eighth grade English project.

200901060834But for former Congressman and recent Libertarian Party presidential nominee Bob Barr, it's the misguided Defense of Marriage Act (DUMBA DOMA) that he wishes he could send to the literary dustbin. This from a new Barr-penned LA Times Op-Ed:

"I can sympathize with the incoming commander in chief. And, after long and careful consideration, I have come to agree with him that the law should be repealed."
...
"I've wrestled with this issue for the last several years and come to the conclusion that DOMA is not working out as planned. In testifying before Congress against a federal marriage amendment, and more recently while making my case to skeptical Libertarians as to why I was worthy of their support as their party's presidential nominee, I have concluded that DOMA is neither meeting the principles of federalism it was supposed to, nor is its impact limited to federal law."
No defending the Defense of Marriage Act [LA Times]

Oh, and plus it's just plain mean and discriminatory. But hey, if they want to do away with it on federalism grounds, then more power to them. Just get rid of the damn thing!

gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-AddThis Feed Button gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Talk to us






*Why are my comments not appearing? See the G-A-Y Comments Policy