RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/29/2009

Judge: The donor rolls must go on

by Jeremy Hooper

Good news for those tired of the Prop 8 supporters' "victim" claims:

A federal judge today denied a request by supporters of Proposition 8 to withhold disclosing anymore names and addresses of donors who gave money to pass the state’s ban on same-sex marriage.
Federal judge refuses to block names of gay marriage supporters [LA Times]

Not as good news for those who enjoy devastating others' lives and then safely and smugly pulling the covers over their heads.

*EARLIER: Well they've already altered one law, why not another? [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I have to admit, that this suit has piqued my interest in this last group of donor names. I mean, really, what were they trying to hide? There has to be something buried in this list that is embarrassing, or incriminating, or something. I think the list has to be released some time early in Feb, so it may prove to be worth a once-over.

Posted by: Dick Mills | Jan 29, 2009 8:16:54 PM

Agreed, Dick.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Jan 29, 2009 8:22:23 PM

Glad the court ruled to pull the white sheets off their heads so we can see who the heterosexual-supremacists really are!

Posted by: TwoHusbandsTogetherInLoveSince1976 | Jan 29, 2009 9:14:16 PM

Yes. 1600 new names of (traditional) marriage supporters out MONDAY,

Posted by: LOrion | Jan 30, 2009 12:58:04 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails