RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/15/2009

Video: That Phil show we talked about but never showed you

by Jeremy Hooper

We posted several times about the "Dr. Phil" episode that booked two anti-LGBT faith-based personalities, Focus on the Family's Glenn Stanton and NARTH's Joseph Nicolosi, to counter the established medical community on the subject of gender identity. We did not, however, get around to showing you clips from the show. Now, thanks a tipoff from our friends at ExGayWatch, we will.

In the first one, Nicolosi and Stanton convey their movement's convenient theories (overbearing mother/detached father) to a visibly annoyed mom:

And you know what? We have to give credit where credit is due, and offer a kudos to Dr. Phil for immediately pointing out that Stanton/Nicolosi's play-acting extends beyond transgender issues. We still think there is a great potential for danger in booking this sort of show; but it is nice that there was far more of an attempt to shed a light on what's really going on here than there was during Glenn Stanton's last appearance.

Here's another clip, this one shedding light on the actual medical science that surrounds gender identity:

Fair. Reasoned. Fact guiding the research rather than research that conforms to their desired outcome. A concern for the child's actual welfare, and not what their religious beliefs tell them is the only acceptable norm. The difference between the two sides is simply not point/conterpoint -- it is science vs. agenda.

*Read more commentary at XGW:
‘Dr. Nicolosi, I Think Your Theory Sucks,’ Says Mom [XGW]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I love how Toni looked into Nicolosi's eyes and said "I think your theory sucks"

Posted by: queerunity | Jan 15, 2009 10:44:59 AM

This is basically advertising ex-gay clinics... for transgender kids. God forbid we should fail to conform to gender roles.

Posted by: queenie | Jan 15, 2009 12:29:00 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails