RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/20/2009

Audio: Something old, something new, something biased, something myopic

by Jeremy Hooper

My partner and I are knee deep in wedding planning. This weekend we're going to a flea market so that we can fulfill this high-low design concept that we have (pairing found objects and nostalgic pieces with high end flora arrangements). In two weeks we're taking his parents to Connecticut to show them around the venue that will host our mid-June ceremony and reception. Our nighttime TV viewing has become a multitasking experience -- one eye on "30 Rock," the other on a computer display showing options for rings, table rentals, etc. And just last week we were excited to finally nail down our honeymoon (a European cruise). It's fun, it's daunting -- it is our wedding experience.

Images-18But as Charla Bansley, an anti-gay activist based out of Maine, will tell you around the 2:08 mark: We have no right to see our wedding plans are not special. In fact, they pose a dangerous threat to all of those heterosexuals whose own special plans we nasty gays could never hope to match Listen in:





*Audio source: Maine's "Stand for Marriage Rally" a Phenomenal Success [CWA]

Discriminatory and self-absorbed. Grab your cameras, "Bridezillas" producers: We've found a nut you all have yet to crack!

Oh, and Ms. Bansley: Your lil' marriage event was not a success. Maybe you drew higher than expected numbers. However, your hurtful event's second class citizen-creating intentions have already preordained its eventual failure!

**EARLIER: Scenes from an anti-marriage [G-A-Y]
Mom-dad setups are always right? Riiiiiiiiiiiight. [G-A-Y]
Roses on the 14th, thorns on the 15th [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Oh, pooh on her! ... Thanks for the update.

Posted by: LOrion | Feb 20, 2009 12:25:23 PM

They'll never get it. It's a CIVIL matter.

Posted by: SammySeattle | Feb 20, 2009 1:11:50 PM

Or they get it and just want to keep America confused. Either way, it's annoying.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Feb 20, 2009 1:13:47 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails