RECENT  POSTS:  » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open » Video: 'Ex-gay' speaker at upcoming ERLC summit equates talking to gay people with talking to cancer patients » GLAAD: Mainstream media is catching on to NOM's broader agenda » FRC's Values Voter Summit puts anti-gay bakers on a marriage panel; so we won, basically » GOP front group NOM raising money for a GOP US Senate » Leave beloved children's author Beverly Cleary out of your dastardly agenda, NOM! » Video: Another hour, another anti-gay activist warning society of its impending, gay-initiated doom » Video: Target features gay dads in new ad #MadeToMatter  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/23/2009

26-4!

by Jeremy Hooper

6A00D8341C503453Ef011168C652B3970C.Jpg-1How's same-sex marriage advancing in Vermont? Well, pretty smoothly if you judge by the nice veto-proof majority of state senators that just sided with equality:

Late this afternoon, the Senate voted 26-4 to advance the same-sex marriage equality bill on to the House of Representatives. The House will begin its consideration of the bill tomorrow.
Gay marriage bill passes Vermont Senate [NECN]

A good showing! Now here's hoping that a massive majority in the House will side with the valid minority that only wants to protect their own.

**Our complete VT archive

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Well, California's Legislature did that twice! But the Governor refused to sign, both times. I understand Vermont's isn't likely to either.

Posted by: LOrionL | Mar 24, 2009 12:10:31 AM

Jeremy, do you know when the vote is in the VT house, and what it would take to get a veto-proof number?

Posted by: Phil in Colorado | Mar 24, 2009 11:22:00 AM

Hearing begins today, vote could come this week. And a veto-proof majority would be 100+ members, which is quite possible with the democratic/progressive makeup.

That's the big difference between calfornia, lorion -- the possibilty of a veto override.

Posted by: G-A-YY | Mar 24, 2009 11:38:08 AM

101+, I shouldve said

Posted by: G-A-Y | Mar 24, 2009 11:56:57 AM

Wow... what is there, 150 members in the Vermont house?

Posted by: Phil in Colorado | Mar 24, 2009 12:12:53 PM

Yea, 150. According to Wiki, this is the current breakdown:

Democratic - 96

Republican - 47

VT Progressive Party - 5

Independent - 2

Posted by: G-A-Y | Mar 24, 2009 12:23:38 PM

Thanks!

Posted by: Phil in Colorado | Mar 24, 2009 5:08:50 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails