RECENT  POSTS:  » 'Mask is coming off' LGBTs, says man who vowed to export and/or criminalize LGBTs » Exxon, infamous holdout on fair and decent employment protections, could be running out of options » Oregon baker who refused same-sex wedding cake bakes for 'ex-gay' org » PFOX rebrands; into group play, seemingly » Audio: Listen to this ADF spinmeister and his anti-gay spin » Report: US District judge won't deny justice to gay Coloradans; might delay it, though » AFA to POTUS: End your 'love affair with homosexuality,' give anti-gay Christians entitlement instead » Congressional right wing's right-side-of-history whip count: 8–271 » NOM, Manhattan Declaration turn Unitarian's anti-slavery, anti-war into pro-discrimination anthem » Matt Barber and Peter LaBarbera tease America's coming anti-gay street revolts  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/09/2009

Anal sex news you can use, with Peter LaBarbera

by Jeremy Hooper

When it comes to attacks on our sex, Peter LaBarbera can certainly lube 'em up and mount 'em. For instance, here is the entirety of a new piece that the "power anti-sodom" has posted to his Americans For Truth site:

Picture 3-192
MSM=Gross Perversion: ‘Power Bottom’ Defined [AFT]

Of course he did. Because if there's one thing that "pro-family" evangelicals need to know, it's definitely the varying levels of submission and aggression involved in dude-sex. A guy who just lies there and takes it, they can totally deal with. But a Peter-LaBarberaguy who takes charge of his nightly prostrate massage? Lubed-up line = crossed!

What next, Pete? A primer on anal kegels? An in-depth look into the "reverse cowboy" position? Maybe a discussion on the pros and cons of Wet Platinum? We, and your conservative Baptist readership, will all be waiting on pins, needles, or....nevermind.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I can just imagine the peter drooling at your suggestions.

Posted by: RainbowPhoenix | Mar 9, 2009 8:39:50 AM

I think that LaBarbera needs an definition in the Urban Dictionary akin to the Santorum and Saddleback entries.

I think it should be something like that cum-rag you kept hidden under the bed in grade-school. Like: "... hey babe, if you aren't going to lick this off, then toss me that LaBarbera stashed in the corner over there."

Or maybe that bit of yellowish green phlegm that your grandmother seems to always save to hock up every time that you go over to help her weed her flower beds. Like: "I swear! I thought that MeMa's LaBarbera was going to get up and walk away under it's own steam!" Or, "that industrial sludge of a LaBarbera took on a life of it's own, quickly overgrowing the Petri dish, threatening the civility of the growth chamber.. then the hazmat team arrived."

Posted by: Dick Mills | Mar 9, 2009 9:04:31 AM

They ought to just change their name to 'Americans for Homosexuality' already.

Posted by: ZJ | Mar 9, 2009 9:20:49 AM

Or, LaBarbera: having the look, demeanor and comb-over appropriate to a pedophile. Like, "... in other news, the Metro PD apprehended another LaBarbera as he was skulking around the girl's locker room at Central Jr. High this afternoon."

Posted by: Dick Mills | Mar 9, 2009 9:53:25 AM

Ok, I am not sure which is sadder, the fact that he actually looked up those definitions or the fact that he quotes as "truth" an Urban Dictionary entry. The Urban dictionary is titled, "Urban Dictionary is the dictionary YOU WROTE"

Posted by: mdoutloud | Mar 9, 2009 9:58:10 AM

When did "urban dictionary" become a source? He should look up Santorum. Power Bottom.. lol he even included the little sentences. Pete, you are so gay!!

Posted by: Craig | Mar 9, 2009 11:51:36 AM

Jeez. Pete must be one frustrated son of a gun.

Posted by: Mike in the Tundra | Mar 9, 2009 12:21:07 PM

And the definition of irony? A few posts down, Peter prints a response to a letter accusing him of being secretly gay. Apparently he has "never struggled" with homosexuality.

I am not saying anything else cause it's too damned easy.

Posted by: a. mcewen | Mar 9, 2009 12:34:04 PM

"if there's one thing that "pro-family" evangelicals need to know, it's definitely the varying levels of submission and aggression involved in dude-sex."

Fascinated with all this stuff, isn't he? Wow.

He thinks about it more than you guys do.

Posted by: Bonnie_Half-Elven | Mar 9, 2009 12:43:30 PM

Pegging. That's all I have to say.

Posted by: SammySeattle | Mar 9, 2009 1:23:53 PM

Maybe somebody should tell Peter most Heterosexual women could be considered power bottoms.

Posted by: Alonzo | Mar 9, 2009 1:55:01 PM

*nods sagely* WET is a good lube....

Posted by: Tim | Mar 9, 2009 2:44:00 PM

I thought of saddlebacking when I read this, so I went to look it up. Thankfully it was already there:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=saddlebacking

Now that's anal sex news you can use.

Posted by: Kip | Mar 9, 2009 4:19:33 PM

Get this guy some schlong already!

Posted by: Chris | Mar 10, 2009 1:44:39 AM

Three Questions from a gay vet:
Is it just me or is that LaBarbera kinda hot?
Is the website for real or just some guy with an opinion?
Are video podcasts from the site available?

Posted by: 1fanboy2many | Mar 10, 2009 9:16:09 PM

Peter's talking about you again:

http://americansfortruth.com/news/the-bottom-line-behavior-is-the-issue-and-sodomy-is-disgusting.html

Posted by: Alonzo | Mar 11, 2009 6:57:38 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails