RECENT  POSTS:  » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry » Video: AFA prez expounds on organization's movement-destructive ad by adding even more religious fervor » NOM resorts to blatant lying in its 2015 #March4Marriage materials » NOM coalition partner: America will fall unless you March For Marriage » AFA helps SCOTUS see that opposition to *civil* marriage equality is all about religious fervor  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/11/2009

Even in this economy, gay Floridians can count on the Rich

by Jeremy Hooper

Nan-RichNan Rich, the Florida state senator who's been trying for the past few years to rid the Sunshine State of its noxious ban on gay adoptions, is back on her game again this legislative session:

State Sen. Nan Rich, a Weston Democrat who is co-chair of the Senate Children & Families Committee, has filed a bill to repeal the 1977 Florida law that prohibits gay men and lesbians from adopting children. A second bill would specify that judges would determine adoptions based solely on ''the best interests'' of children.
Florida lawmaker files bills that would legalize gay adoptions [Miami Herald]
(H/t: LOrion)

So why should we care this year more than others? Well, we have favorable court decisions on our side that suggest what we have always known to be true: That Anita Bryant's banny baby is and has always been unconstitutional. And while those rulings are awaiting appeal, one would think that Rich's fellow lawmakers might pay them some mind, considering that maybe, just maybe, the judiciary knows a thing or two about such matters. And maybe they'll see an interest/need in being the ones to put the kibosh on the les-gay-bi-wash.

Cross your panhandles, equality fans!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

IMAGINE, just imagine asking legislators to do something in the 'interest of children.' I do hope they pay attention. And did you see where that 14 year adoption case in Israel finally resulted in a postitive result. The 'child' is now 30, but also a legal son!

Posted by: LOrion | Mar 11, 2009 3:03:56 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails