RECENT  POSTS:  » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/02/2009

Finding truth in 'pro-family' art

by Jeremy Hooper

Randy Thomasson's Campaign For Children and Families -- an outfit considered too extreme by even California's mainstream "pro-family" movement -- has announced that they will be launching a revamped website in the coming days. However, they've already provided a glimpse of their new logo:

Picture 5-185

So let's see: There are brackets containing figures that look like flipped exclamation points with no discernible limbs.

You know what? We. LOVE. It! Why? Well, because it perfectly conveys the key points that seem to make up this also-ran group's core message: That within anti-gay California's B-racket are lots of exclaimed points, all of which turn reality upside down, yet none of which have any legs.

So yea -- a brilliant move, CCF! Here's hoping that the full site provides as much subliminal fodder for us to mine on our next slow news day.

CCF's website [SaveCalifornia.com]

***ALSO: The new logo is going to be so easy for us to replicate using only simple ASCII characters:


[¡¡¡¡]


space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Looks like a sad, crying, cockeyed blockhead with dangling earrings!

Posted by: Dick Mills | Mar 2, 2009 8:35:49 PM

Its nice they chose figures where gender is irrelevant. In fact it looks to me like two women. One with a big butt and one with big boobs.

Maybe they are coming around.

Posted by: Steve - Geneva, IL | Mar 2, 2009 9:41:38 PM

I assume we're supposed to be able to tell the genders by the sizes. Once again they show that they only care about preserving male privilege.

Posted by: RainbowPhoenix | Mar 2, 2009 10:32:31 PM

Wouldn't "@#$%&*!" be a better ASCII representation?

Posted by: Dana | Mar 2, 2009 11:21:26 PM

I guess in their world all women are pear shaped.

Posted by: Timothy | Mar 3, 2009 3:10:35 PM

She's not pear shaped, she's wearing a dress. (As all good women should.) I also love that they made the man taller. They really thought this out!

Posted by: Matt Algren | Mar 3, 2009 3:46:44 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails