RECENT  POSTS:  » Well we would hate to be a headache, now wouldn't we? » Oh would you look at that? Hate crimes rose right alongside far-right's lies » D.C. Catholic BULLetins ratchet up first syllable » Happy Chanukah from Focus on the Family » Adam's bits cut for too closely showing dancer if his own bits are » 'No Law Against Woman Marrying Another Woman', says 103 years ago » What the hell is Brian Brown smoking?! » Their bullcaca will never ENDA » Here it is: 'The Manhattan Declaration' » For Gwen For Lateisha For Angie For Adolphus For Simmie For Ebony For Lawrence For Duanna For...  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/02/2009

Finding truth in 'pro-family' art

Randy Thomasson's Campaign For Children and Families -- an outfit considered too extreme by even California's mainstream "pro-family" movement -- has announced that they will be launching a revamped website in the coming days. However, they've already provided a glimpse of their new logo:

Picture 5-185

So let's see: There are brackets containing figures that look like flipped exclamation points with no discernible limbs.

You know what? We. LOVE. It! Why? Well, because it perfectly conveys the key points that seem to make up this also-ran group's core message: That within anti-gay California's B-racket are lots of exclaimed points, all of which turn reality upside down, yet none of which have any legs.

So yea -- a brilliant move, CCF! Here's hoping that the full site provides as much subliminal fodder for us to mine on our next slow news day.

CCF's website [SaveCalifornia.com]

***ALSO: The new logo is going to be so easy for us to replicate using only simple ASCII characters:


[¡¡¡¡]


gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-AddThis Feed Button gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Looks like a sad, crying, cockeyed blockhead with dangling earrings!

Posted by: Dick Mills | Mar 2, 2009 8:35:49 PM

Its nice they chose figures where gender is irrelevant. In fact it looks to me like two women. One with a big butt and one with big boobs.

Maybe they are coming around.

Posted by: Steve - Geneva, IL | Mar 2, 2009 9:41:38 PM

I assume we're supposed to be able to tell the genders by the sizes. Once again they show that they only care about preserving male privilege.

Posted by: RainbowPhoenix | Mar 2, 2009 10:32:31 PM

Wouldn't "@#$%&*!" be a better ASCII representation?

Posted by: Dana | Mar 2, 2009 11:21:26 PM

I guess in their world all women are pear shaped.

Posted by: Timothy | Mar 3, 2009 3:10:35 PM

She's not pear shaped, she's wearing a dress. (As all good women should.) I also love that they made the man taller. They really thought this out!

Posted by: Matt Algren | Mar 3, 2009 3:46:44 PM

Talk to us






*Why are my comments not appearing? See the G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails