RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/19/2009

Video: Green Mountain debate

by Jeremy Hooper

They packed 'em in last night at the Vermont State House, where locals gathered to speak both for and against a bill that would grant basic fairness to same-sex couples. Here's an overwhelming amount of video from the proceedings, courtesy of VT Freedom to Marry:










Public Hearing [VT Freedom To Marry]

So many people. On an "American Idol" night, no less! We don't know how many people will RSVP to our weddings, but the contention over our right to actually have one is the social event of the season.

*Our complete VT roundup: Vermont archive [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

5th video down, 3:30 in.

Wow.

Angry lady is angry.

Posted by: zortnac | Mar 19, 2009 2:59:08 PM

And of course deference if given to the Bishop. And what does he do, state the usual bogus arguments and ask us not to be angry and violent about it.

Posted by: Tony P | Mar 19, 2009 4:42:33 PM

I can't believe I watched that lady's entire tirade.

Twice.

Good Lord, what's the use of getting your panties in a bunch over something that has no adverse effect on you that isn't entirely perceived? I'm of the opinion most of the anti-speakers here just need a better hobby.

Posted by: Alle | Mar 19, 2009 6:41:55 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails