RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/19/2009

Video: Green Mountain debate

by Jeremy Hooper

They packed 'em in last night at the Vermont State House, where locals gathered to speak both for and against a bill that would grant basic fairness to same-sex couples. Here's an overwhelming amount of video from the proceedings, courtesy of VT Freedom to Marry:










Public Hearing [VT Freedom To Marry]

So many people. On an "American Idol" night, no less! We don't know how many people will RSVP to our weddings, but the contention over our right to actually have one is the social event of the season.

*Our complete VT roundup: Vermont archive [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

5th video down, 3:30 in.

Wow.

Angry lady is angry.

Posted by: zortnac | Mar 19, 2009 2:59:08 PM

And of course deference if given to the Bishop. And what does he do, state the usual bogus arguments and ask us not to be angry and violent about it.

Posted by: Tony P | Mar 19, 2009 4:42:33 PM

I can't believe I watched that lady's entire tirade.

Twice.

Good Lord, what's the use of getting your panties in a bunch over something that has no adverse effect on you that isn't entirely perceived? I'm of the opinion most of the anti-speakers here just need a better hobby.

Posted by: Alle | Mar 19, 2009 6:41:55 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails