RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Wearing Crocs is a choice (and other practical tips for straight guys) » Top @Vote4MarriageNC ally on gays: 'I don't even think maggots would do that' » Standing up by stepping down: Del. Sam Arora's top adviser puts principle before paycheck, politics » NJ.com poll shows @GovChristie veto as out-of-touch; 'Duh,' says ten years from now » NOM EXPOSED: NOM's Thomas Peters touts 'mainstream' news site; firmly plants NOM on extreme end of 'culture war' » NOM's Ruth Institute hopes to win friends; thinks knocking 'The Enemy' off 'his plow' is good way to do it » National Pray for [the Dissolution of Gay People's Marriages] Day » Really, Fox News? A 'brawl'? » I can't escape the 'culture war': 'Just let me buy a damn water filter!' Edition » Gov. Christie saved us from God's wrath (and other things I can't believe can kill civil rights in 2012)  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/13/2009

VT: Wedding plans have wrench; will wedding planners hammer out win?

by Jeremy Hooper

CA: Legislature twice passes a marriage bill, but governor refuses to sign.

NY: State assembly and back-to-back governors support a marriage equality bill, but the state senate fails to come around.

NJ: Supreme court offers ruling that could have granted marriage equality, but the legislature choose to take the civil unions route instead.

We gays are used to seeing the stars almost align, only to then be pulled out of the sky by a certain governmental person or body. Now the same situation is arising in Vermont, where the state legislature is poised to bump up that 200903130634state's civil unions system to full marriage equality, while at the same time, Republican governor Jim Douglas is making his opposition to same-sex nups more known than ever before.

The AP (via Wash. Blade) has more:

Douglas says Vermont's civil unions law is good the way it is, and he says the state doesn't need a "divisive" debate on the topic.
Vt. gov. says he opposes same-sex marriage [AP/Wash Blade]

Though there is a silver lining to this un-Ben&Jerry's-like scoop of poop. It is believed that the legislature might have a veto-proof majority, making Douglas' opposition, for all intents and purposes, about as important to equality advocates as whether or not dear aunt Sally plans to drunkedly do the wedding chicken dance at their forthcoming ceremonies.

Hearings begin Monday on the marriage bill introduced by senator Pete Shumlin (D-Putney). We'll keep monitoring the progression, while hoping Gov. Douglas will temper his regression.

gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-AddThis Feed Button gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

It tells me why we'll never have equality if we leave it to elected officials. But we will have it through acts of the courts.

Posted by: Tony P | Mar 13, 2009 5:25:58 PM

Why is it people who have their rights always proclaim second-best is "good enough" for us?

Posted by: Buffy | Mar 14, 2009 2:54:32 AM

Next stop, Cleveland?
http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2009/04/seventyfive_people_rally_to_cr.html#more

Posted by: TG | Apr 8, 2009 1:08:25 AM

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails