RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/14/2009

Land in Iowa (but not for a same-sex wedding)

by Jeremy Hooper

In a new piece that he's penned for Baptist Press, Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission president Richard Land calls Iowa...

The poster child for marriage amendments [BP News]

Replacing the anti-gay amendments' previous poster child:

200904141032-1

If you ask us, this guy's much more representative of the amends. than is the Hawkeye State!

**SEE ALSO: Timothy Kincaid has written more about the Land piece: Richard Land’s Ignorance-Based Argument [BTB]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Land: With no residency requirements, the court's opinion means at the end of April when the order goes into effect, same-sex couples will be free to travel from other states to exchange "vows" in the Iowa heartland.

Me: What? They aren't really vows?

"Yeah I know I promised to love and cherish but I had my fingers crossed"

Posted by: Timothy | Apr 14, 2009 2:09:23 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails