RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead) » Full trailer: 'The Normal Heart' » Vintage Clinton era oppo memo perhaps even more relevant today » Concerned Women For America advises churches to lockdown exclusionary marriage views » Video: What does conservative columnist Cal Thomas see as America's biggest threat? Take a guess. » Correcting NOM's fallacious fear graphic » Gee, Bryan, can't understand why federal courts are rejecting you gay = incest view » Former NOM sr. associate admits shift: Moving away from intellectual arguments, focusing on spiritual » Prop 8 defense attorney now planning lesbian daughter's wedding » If you can't afford your event, NOM, perhaps you should just cancel  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/14/2009

Land in Iowa (but not for a same-sex wedding)

by Jeremy Hooper

In a new piece that he's penned for Baptist Press, Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission president Richard Land calls Iowa...

The poster child for marriage amendments [BP News]

Replacing the anti-gay amendments' previous poster child:

200904141032-1

If you ask us, this guy's much more representative of the amends. than is the Hawkeye State!

**SEE ALSO: Timothy Kincaid has written more about the Land piece: Richard Land’s Ignorance-Based Argument [BTB]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Land: With no residency requirements, the court's opinion means at the end of April when the order goes into effect, same-sex couples will be free to travel from other states to exchange "vows" in the Iowa heartland.

Me: What? They aren't really vows?

"Yeah I know I promised to love and cherish but I had my fingers crossed"

Posted by: Timothy | Apr 14, 2009 2:09:23 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails