RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/14/2009

Land in Iowa (but not for a same-sex wedding)

by Jeremy Hooper

In a new piece that he's penned for Baptist Press, Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission president Richard Land calls Iowa...

The poster child for marriage amendments [BP News]

Replacing the anti-gay amendments' previous poster child:

200904141032-1

If you ask us, this guy's much more representative of the amends. than is the Hawkeye State!

**SEE ALSO: Timothy Kincaid has written more about the Land piece: Richard Land’s Ignorance-Based Argument [BTB]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Land: With no residency requirements, the court's opinion means at the end of April when the order goes into effect, same-sex couples will be free to travel from other states to exchange "vows" in the Iowa heartland.

Me: What? They aren't really vows?

"Yeah I know I promised to love and cherish but I had my fingers crossed"

Posted by: Timothy | Apr 14, 2009 2:09:23 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails