RECENT  POSTS:  » What most people aren't getting about the fake non-troversies of the anti-gay right » 'Weekly Standard' asst. editor equates Tim Cook with man who pits God against him » Michigan pastors make unfortunate lifestyle choice; say they'll go to jail rather than not discriminate » PFOX's Quinlan says SBC leader's opposition to 'reparative therapy' is cruel » That Idaho wedding venue posts new 'rules and regulations'; will still perform non-Christian weddings » Another deceptive thing about NOM's duplicitous anti-Hagan ad » NOM trying to shape Arkansas politics without even learning state's abbreviation » Video: Focus on the Family staffer who calls homosexuality 'particularly evil lie of Satan' hangs out in Chicago's Boystown » Video: Another new NOM ad targets Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR); uses James O'Keefe video as source » What the heck is 'NOM Victory Fund'?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/20/2009

Video: What, because only those with 'questionable sexual orientations' wish to keep our president alive?

by Jeremy Hooper

You know that DHS report that warns about the potential for right wing extremism to rise in this new Obama climate? The one that aims to protect us all? The one that matches similar studies charting left wing extremism? The one that should concern anyone, regardless of party affiliation, yet that has instead led the social conservatives to denounce it as nothing more than a work of liberal fiction? Yea, well, longtime figurehead of that faction, Pat Robertson, is now intimating that "questionable sexuality" might also be behind the perfectly fair, perfectly learned, perfectly eye-opening document:

But hey, at least he refers to it as an orientation. For the "gays choose their sexuality" social conservatives, that's actually a bit of progress.

Robertson: DHS Official Behind Extremism Report Must Be Someone Whose ‘Sexual Orientation…Is In Question’ [ThinkProgress]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

"If you JAM up their telephone lines GOOD FOR YOU"

How can they advocate tying up phone lines at a government organization charged with protecting the safety of this nation and its citizens. What are they going to say if, on the off chance, their little stunt backfires and a person with a CREDIBLE national security tip can't get through?

-OH wait... blame those with questionable sexual orientation's and people that want abortion on demand.


Posted by: Jeff Chang | Apr 20, 2009 2:42:51 PM

I don't think anyone is home upstairs, even if they left a few lights on.

Posted by: zortnac | Apr 20, 2009 2:43:14 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails