RECENT  POSTS:  » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/23/2009

What about being a concerned woman with a fetish for deceit -- is that too an 'orientation'?

by Jeremy Hooper

Yet another "pro-family" group is joining SPLC-certified hate group the Traditional Values Coalition and Republican-certified Congressman Steve King in declaring that behaviors like bestiality are "sexual orientations. This from the Picture 17-57

Concerned Women For America, who are trotting out this claim in order to resist LGBT-inclusive hate crimes legislation:

In addition to these concerns, there are dozens of types of “sexual orientation” that could be covered under this ill-defined term such as bestiality, pedophilia and incest to name a few (larger list here). How do we know these are not covered by the bill if the terms are not defined?
Democrats Choose to Protect Only Homosexuals [CWA]

And even more ridiculous is that the link that CWA has attached to the word "here" actually clearly labels these so-called "sexual orientations" as exactly what they are: PARAPHILIAS! Their very own "proof" belies their claims!!!!

But perhaps some of the mud that they're so ferociously slinging at this valid piece of legislation has blinded their eyes from what is so easily perceptible.

*EARLIER: What about wanting to screw a bill with lies -- is that an 'orientation'? [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Evidently they're counting on people having poor reading comprehension skills.
Or being able to understand the HETEROSEXUALITY is also an orientation.

Posted by: Bill S | Apr 23, 2009 5:44:24 PM

No, its just your run of the mill. PATHOLOGICAL Lying from the severely Paranoid.
Rather like CHENEY.... and LIMPBAUGH.

Posted by: LOrion | Apr 23, 2009 8:32:15 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails