RECENT  POSTS:  » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open » Video: 'Ex-gay' speaker at upcoming ERLC summit equates talking to gay people with talking to cancer patients » GLAAD: Mainstream media is catching on to NOM's broader agenda » FRC's Values Voter Summit puts anti-gay bakers on a marriage panel; so we won, basically » GOP front group NOM raising money for a GOP US Senate » Leave beloved children's author Beverly Cleary out of your dastardly agenda, NOM! » Video: Another hour, another anti-gay activist warning society of its impending, gay-initiated doom » Video: Target features gay dads in new ad #MadeToMatter  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/27/2009

36 years of needless, overwrought debate

by Jeremy Hooper

Think this whole marriage discussion is a mostly 21st century conversation? Well journey back with us to February of 1973, when the Tucson Daily Citizen ran a very ahead of its time article on the "sanctity" of homo-gays getting hitched. It's a little too religious-focused for our civil marriage-seeking liking; but it's quite interesting, nonetheless:

(click for full view)
Picture 11-124Page2

*Download pdf: Tucson Daily Citizen [2/17/1973]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I read part of the article and some f the comments by the Episcopal priest don't look that bad. On the other hand, FREE HAM!

Posted by: EdgyB | May 27, 2009 3:14:55 PM

Is it to late to pick up my free ham?

Posted by: Penguinsaur | May 27, 2009 4:02:36 PM

"Is it to late to pick up my free ham?"

Ha!

Posted by: G-A-Y | May 27, 2009 4:14:33 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails