RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-LGBT pundits hate nothing more than own words, example #532,123 » Well if CBN says it, it must be true » Video: Fake news calls out fake victims » AG Holder: Whichever way SCOTUS goes, work continues » Video: Powerful 'Families Are Forever' trailer (watch and share!) » Republican does what all GOP candidates will eventually do (i.e. accept gays); feels MassResistance's wrath (i.e. tsk-tsking blog post) » NOM versus Jennifer Aniston's three-year-old opinion » 'Discriminating with the Stars': Reality TV personality to head FRC's Action arm » FRC back to scanning Google Images for drag queens; ENDA must be back in news » NOM EXPOSED: NOM & Co. trying to create an iconic image to rival HRC's  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/27/2009

36 years of needless, overwrought debate

by Jeremy Hooper

Think this whole marriage discussion is a mostly 21st century conversation? Well journey back with us to February of 1973, when the Tucson Daily Citizen ran a very ahead of its time article on the "sanctity" of homo-gays getting hitched. It's a little too religious-focused for our civil marriage-seeking liking; but it's quite interesting, nonetheless:

(click for full view)
Picture 11-124Page2

*Download pdf: Tucson Daily Citizen [2/17/1973]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I read part of the article and some f the comments by the Episcopal priest don't look that bad. On the other hand, FREE HAM!

Posted by: EdgyB | May 27, 2009 3:14:55 PM

Is it to late to pick up my free ham?

Posted by: Penguinsaur | May 27, 2009 4:02:36 PM

"Is it to late to pick up my free ham?"

Ha!

Posted by: G-A-Y | May 27, 2009 4:14:33 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails