RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/27/2009

36 years of needless, overwrought debate

by Jeremy Hooper

Think this whole marriage discussion is a mostly 21st century conversation? Well journey back with us to February of 1973, when the Tucson Daily Citizen ran a very ahead of its time article on the "sanctity" of homo-gays getting hitched. It's a little too religious-focused for our civil marriage-seeking liking; but it's quite interesting, nonetheless:

(click for full view)
Picture 11-124Page2

*Download pdf: Tucson Daily Citizen [2/17/1973]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I read part of the article and some f the comments by the Episcopal priest don't look that bad. On the other hand, FREE HAM!

Posted by: EdgyB | May 27, 2009 3:14:55 PM

Is it to late to pick up my free ham?

Posted by: Penguinsaur | May 27, 2009 4:02:36 PM

"Is it to late to pick up my free ham?"

Ha!

Posted by: G-A-Y | May 27, 2009 4:14:33 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails