RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years » Video: Mississippian who made soldier his lifestyle choice seeks freedom based on unchosen orientation » One of America's most anti-gay organizations rallies for the Duggars; because of course they would  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/27/2009

36 years of needless, overwrought debate

by Jeremy Hooper

Think this whole marriage discussion is a mostly 21st century conversation? Well journey back with us to February of 1973, when the Tucson Daily Citizen ran a very ahead of its time article on the "sanctity" of homo-gays getting hitched. It's a little too religious-focused for our civil marriage-seeking liking; but it's quite interesting, nonetheless:

(click for full view)
Picture 11-124Page2

*Download pdf: Tucson Daily Citizen [2/17/1973]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I read part of the article and some f the comments by the Episcopal priest don't look that bad. On the other hand, FREE HAM!

Posted by: EdgyB | May 27, 2009 3:14:55 PM

Is it to late to pick up my free ham?

Posted by: Penguinsaur | May 27, 2009 4:02:36 PM

"Is it to late to pick up my free ham?"

Ha!

Posted by: G-A-Y | May 27, 2009 4:14:33 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails