Audio: Dobson Carries on
Not being able to cram all of the various and sundry ways that one can say "protect marriage" into only one segment, Focus on the Family today aired a second part of their Carrie Prejean interview. Here's a brief snip in which Carrie details her preference for subjective interviewers who agree with her "basic" views:
*Audio source: Carrie Part 2 [FOF]
Oh, Carrie. Of course it's easier to talk to Sean Hannity and James Dobson. Of course it's easier to tell Perez Hilton's backside that you think he needs Jesus than it is to say it to his face. Of course it's easier to think that because you said "no offense," your poorly articulated use of personal religious views to chastise others' civil liberties is a testament that's above all reproach. And of course it's easier to claim persecution when you refuse to have an actual, peaceful dialogue with perfectly nice and fair LGBT activists who simply want to explain why we find your views so hurtful/misapplied. But Carrie: Painting gays and their civil rights as "satanic" should not be easy! If you are going to be bold enough to condemn millions upon millions of people, then you should be ready for a little bit o' hard!
If you sign up to push or negate discrimination, then you have signed yourself up for a sometimes tough journey. There's not a LGBT activist living who hasn't know the joy of being painted as a hellbound, kid-corrupting, family-hating, society-wrecking, Jesus-detesting heretic. In both our personal and professional lives, we know hardship. And we also know that our hardships are only heightened by public stances like the ones that you, Carrie, are so proudly and unabashedly taking!
With stakes this high, the scrutiny should be intense. Our advice to you, Carrie: Either school yourself on the issues and become a fearless voice for your side, or move on to less divisive ventures. On can only work "opposite marriage" for so long.
*Oh, and more photos have surfaced. The stars on the picture must be winks from Jesus.
Jeremy, last night Bill O Reilly said that none of the gay activists criticized Perez Hilton for his crude remarks about Carrie PreJean. He also said none of them qualified that she had the right to her opinion even though they disagreed with her.
Bill O claimed that he would correct this on tonight's show if it was shown to him that he was wrong.
Of course you and some others did criticize Perez. Contact Bill O at firstname.lastname@example.org
Here is where you and many others criticized Perez...
"Hey Perez-You're not helping here buddy"
"We don't need people who will just write her off as a "dumb b****," then further (and more misogynistically) state that he'd rather have called her the "c word""
Planet Out's Carter Todd...
"I, for one, feel like he does us more harm than good. Case in point: After Miss California Carrie Prejean told him that marriage should be between a man and a woman, he went on the attack, expressing himself in less than eloquent fashion when he labeled her a "dumb bitch.""
"But who is going to take the guy seriously after he attacks his philosophical foe by calling her a nasty name? It was a classless move, and it was, well, dumb. If anything, I thought that Miss California came out of this situation looking like the winner despite the fact that I disagree with her opposition to gay marriage."
Gay Patriot (a conservative gay blog whose founders are a part of GOProud)...
"How Perez Hilton?s Name-calling Hurts Gay Marriage Debate"
Truth Wins Out's Michael Airhart
"Gay Rights Group Extends Hospitality to Miss California"
"Perez Hilton Does Not Speak For the LGBT Community"
"Is Perez Hilton a Problem For the Gay Community?"
"Perez Hilton: Making Gay People Everywhere Look Bad"
NBC's LA news online's Helen A.S. Popkin
"OMG Perez Hilton! Won?t You Please Shut Up"
Also all The View ladies defended PreJean on their View segments and their interviews with Larry King last week.
Posted by: Josh | May 12, 2009 10:54:52 AM
those photos clearly demonstrate that she blatantly lied to get into miss california and as such deserves to lose her crown.
Posted by: Adam Kautz | May 12, 2009 10:57:19 AM
Wait, wait it was Satan that was tempting her with the gay marriage question? Why doesn't she blame satan for posing nude?
Why is FOF using this woman to promote their anti-gay marriage agenda when she clearly doesn't have any moral issues with posing nude?
It is like the big effing elephant in the room that they choose to ignore.
Posted by: Shaun | May 12, 2009 11:50:45 AM
but she didn't !!!!!!! ARG!!!
Posted by: Piper | May 12, 2009 12:21:10 PM
MEOW!! Evidence for the ned of a boob job.... she was sagging at 20!
Posted by: LOrion | May 12, 2009 2:27:14 PM
How precious!! She thinks that she has been crucified!! I have to wonder if she really knows what that means.
Posted by: Dick Mills | May 12, 2009 3:40:42 PM
Gotta love the silicone-jugged fool calling people "Satanic" while she's a perfect example of the so-called "DEADLY sin" called pride/vanity.
But not surprising, beings she's hanging out with greed (Dobson) and gluttony (Gallagher).
Posted by: Scott | May 12, 2009 4:14:55 PMcomments powered by Disqus