RECENT  POSTS:  » New record: Anti-gay activist Ralph Reed contradicts self in less than minute » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead) » Full trailer: 'The Normal Heart' » Vintage Clinton era oppo memo perhaps even more relevant today » Concerned Women For America advises churches to lockdown exclusionary marriage views » Video: What does conservative columnist Cal Thomas see as America's biggest threat? Take a guess. » Correcting NOM's fallacious fear graphic » Gee, Bryan, can't understand why federal courts are rejecting you gay = incest view » Former NOM sr. associate admits shift: Moving away from intellectual arguments, focusing on spiritual » Prop 8 defense attorney now planning lesbian daughter's wedding  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/26/2009

Lest we forget

by Jeremy Hooper

 Webimage Flags Usa Maflagbl-1
MASSACHUSETTS
 Wikipedia Commons Thumb 3 35 Flag Of Maine.Svg 687Px-Flag Of Maine.Svg
MAINE
 Catalog Images Vermont
VERMONT
 Collegesuniversities Flags Connecticut
CONNECTICUT
Iowa Flag-1
IOWA
and soon, probably...
 Dept Gero Nrcshhm Directory States Images Nh-Flag
NEW HAMPSHIRE
(with NY, NJ, and others in the reasonable future)

Prop 8 is a stumble for our side. But time's mere advancement is a crippling fatal blow for our opposition's!


WontBackDown.org

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

THANK YOU Jeremy! That's how I view today's ruling also.

Posted by: a. mcewen | May 26, 2009 2:17:30 PM

Yes, and let's turn our focus to #2 on your list, Maine. Because as we speak they are collecting signatures to put a People's Veto on the ballot, and I haven't been reading much about what we're doing to combat the signature gathering. And then we'll be looking at another ballot measure in November, with no existing marriages this time.

Posted by: Bruno | May 26, 2009 2:56:05 PM

I don't think we should be counting Maine yet. Not until we've dealt with the Bringham Young veto.

Posted by: RainbowPhoenix | May 26, 2009 3:43:58 PM

While I hoped against hope, deep down I knew this would be the ruling. Fine. Let's have our tears and then move on.

Posted by: stojef | May 26, 2009 3:59:11 PM

Major kudos to WontBackDown.org for using the beautiful Dawn Landes version of the song. This isn't over yet.

Posted by: Patrick | May 26, 2009 6:28:17 PM


Thanks for the balance, Jeremy.

Like others, I have tears for people affected by the California decision. I could just cry - their kids have to go to school tomorrow and face the music.

I just don't understand how, essentially, a majority of people can vote to exclude people's rights. How can people be so hateful? How can that be legal?

Dave has to quit now - I'm very upset.

db

Posted by: dave b | May 26, 2009 9:56:34 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails