RECENT  POSTS:  » Congressional right wing's right-side-of-history whip count: 8–271 » NOM, Manhattan Declaration turn Unitarian's anti-slavery, anti-war into pro-discrimination anthem » Matt Barber and Peter LaBarbera tease America's coming anti-gay street revolts » FRC writer: We're not all the same, 'gay agenda' is 'dangerous for the wellbeing of this nation' » NBC analyst Tony Dungy says he wouldn't have drafted Michael Sam » NOM becomes even more of a generalized anti-LGBT animus organization » Sure, NOM—I'll play your game!! » Bryan Fischer: POTUS 'stood on the graves' of Malaysia Air victims 'to promote the legitimacy of sexual deviancy' » Legal profession made up of ideologues, demands legal ideologue » FRC's senior fellow for exporting/criminalizing gay people bemoan's discrimination's dwindling acceptance  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/08/2009

DADT appeal doesn't find a Souter

by Jeremy Hooper
The U.S. Supreme Court refused to question the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy that prohibits openly gay people from serving in the military, turning away a constitutional challenge to the ban.
‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Policy Left Intact by U.S. High Court [Bloomberg]

Probably for the best, since (a) the current court is iffy at best, and (b) most seem to agree that a repeal should be done legislatively. Even the majority of involved with this case a the lower level weren't on board this proposed SCOTUS hearing.

But still, when dealing with such nasty policy as this, it's always kind of annoying when any attempt to flush it fails. It's kind of how we feel about particularly rancid garbage. We don't care who takes it to the curb or how they get it there: Its existence is so noxious that immediate eradication should be everyone's quick and efficient goal.

**RELATED: Law Dork puts this all into perspective: DADT SCOTUS ‘Rejection’: What’s It Mean? [LD]
SLDN's official release: Statement on the Supreme Court’s Denial of Cert [SLDN]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Oh, so very well said. Will use the garbage metaphor....love it!

Posted by: LOrion | Jun 8, 2009 12:05:28 PM

Unfortunately, most everyone, including me, thought at first a Supremes decision in this case would have ruled on the law [probably badly] but SLDN says it wouldn't have.

QUOTE: "Even if the Supreme Court had taken the Pietrangelo case, the Court would not have decided the constitutionality of DADT."

What DID happen?

"...In court papers, THE ADMINISTRATION said the appeals court ruled correctly in this case when it found that "don't ask, don't tell" is "rationally related to the government's legitimate interest in military discipline and cohesion."

In other words, Obama just castrated his own argument to Congress why they should repeal by DEFENDING the law for the SAME reasons that they justified passing it in the first place. What could he say to them now, "Oooops, sorry we take it all back"?

Posted by: Michael Bedwell | Jun 9, 2009 2:48:34 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails