« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »



by Jeremy Hooper

This comes from the Angelqueen Catholic forum:

Picture 13-86
Picture 12-93
Picture 11-129

These two come from the same commenter:

Picture 9-131
Picture 10-127


space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

To that commentator - BULLSH*T and remember the days - unfortunately too long ago - when catholics (and probably their holy rosaries) were burned at the stake - - with comments like yours I sometimes think I long for those days! PS I'm GAY and proud of it and I'm a much better catholic than you are - you certainly DO NOT follow the teachings of Jesus Christ (I'd say a Satan follower) - - since you are such a believer (YEAH, RIGHT) I would not look forward to your Judgment Day.

Posted by: tom | Jun 10, 2009 12:58:44 PM

So the Holy Rosary is the Catholic version of the Holy Spirit. As a former member of the church, I never thought bead necklaces granted wishes. I guess that's why Catholic priests are so straight *sarcasm*.

Posted by: ---- | Jun 10, 2009 1:02:54 PM

Fortunately, the polls show that lay catholics are slightly more liberal than the general population.

Posted by: RainbowPhoenix | Jun 10, 2009 1:09:40 PM

In fairness, this website is inspired by the uber-traditional Society of St. Pius X (SSPX). SSPX is in schism with the Catholic Church and definitely stuck in a pre-Vatican II mindset. For any Catholic this is easy to see from a quick perusal of the site.

Posted by: John | Jun 10, 2009 1:23:09 PM

At first I thought this was satire.

Seriously "Angelqueen"? Can you possibly have a gayer name?

Posted by: Jake | Jun 10, 2009 1:28:41 PM

Do you think they might be affiliated with the Catholic League?

Posted by: ---- | Jun 10, 2009 2:50:04 PM

Feel that "Christian" love.

Posted by: Buffy | Jun 10, 2009 3:04:08 PM

uh oh! looks like someone forgot his WWJD bracelet at home! I'll tell you what Jesus would do, he would go money changer in the temple on all your fundie asses.

Posted by: anon | Jun 10, 2009 8:36:23 PM

Sodomites should be killed?
Then can we start with the ones prominently featured in the Church? I would suggest starting alphabetically; pity how long it would take to reach Ted Haggard though.

Posted by: | Jun 10, 2009 9:38:27 PM

Mmmmmm, sodomy. Don't knock what you haven't tried. I bet those tight little Christian holes of yours could use some attention. Step right up and feel your Lord's love.

Posted by: James | Jun 10, 2009 9:45:11 PM

God doesn't create Sodomites?

That's not what the New Testament says:

Romans I 1:26-32


God took the non-believers and made them Gay so that they would be attacked and killed.

"26For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

28And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

29Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

30Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

31Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

32Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them."

Posted by: Jordan | Jun 10, 2009 9:46:11 PM

so... if you're gay and don't practice sodomy is it still a sin? after all, about a third of gay men don't practice anal sex of any kind. There are actually way more straight people who practice it.

Posted by: Heather | Jun 10, 2009 10:41:16 PM

Oh look. Somebody dug up another fossil.

Posted by: TJ | Jun 10, 2009 11:59:28 PM

K so someone should have told my dad when he died from cimplications of diabetes, that it wasn't insulin he needed! It was the roasary! Ten hail mary's and an our father!


Posted by: Stef | Jun 11, 2009 12:28:43 AM

the catholic priests who stuck their dicks in little boys mouths should burn in hell

Posted by: HornyPriest | Jun 11, 2009 12:50:10 AM

Janet Napolitano was right to apologize to America for being so mean to the right wing.

Yesterday, did anyone think a white supremacist would commit an act of terrorism in the Holocaust Museum?

Or an abortion clinic?

Or an immigration center?

Cooler heads always prevail - the greatest signal that gay rights will come to be is that the right is coming *unglued* these days.

Posted by: DN | Jun 11, 2009 1:16:06 AM

Simply, where does the bible tell us to kill gays ? Were not in the old testament, were in a new covenant, the laws in levi and deut are not for today, or else wed all be dead already straight or gay.

I could call myself a christian and do many things that is not condoned in the bible, doesnt mean anything.

80% of america thinks they are christian, prob 30% actually are saved. Sad but true.

If you want to be saved, repent and believe. If not dont. But no "real" christian will ever ever do you harm for being gay. If a christian threatens a gay with death, he is not a christian, or severely backsliding.

Its simply not biblical to harm gays if you understand how to separate the old and new testaments. Although it is Sin just as drunkenness and straight adultery.

Posted by: bob | Jun 11, 2009 1:24:32 AM

God is in your imagination. Sorry.

Posted by: Reddit | Jun 11, 2009 1:42:06 AM

"you don't know how depraved america is until you attend a public high school (unfortunately, i do)."

you don't know how backwards, ignorant and hateful christianity can be until you attend a catholic school (unfortunately, i do)...

Posted by: lauren | Jun 11, 2009 2:04:35 AM

newsflash - leviticus was written more than 2000 years ago by people who believed that plants were talking to them. it has zero relevance today, unless you're using it to prop up a pre-existing personal feeling about something. in which case, it's a human opinion and not a divine one.

Posted by: Sean | Jun 11, 2009 4:45:35 AM

wait, i commented on that while under the impression that this was a rabid cross-licking website. whoops.

Posted by: Sean | Jun 11, 2009 4:46:51 AM

That forum needs trolling. :)

Posted by: Lotte | Jun 11, 2009 10:54:16 AM

"vile affections" and "that which is unseemly" can mean ANYTHING you want them to mean. So it's purely subjective to interpret them as references to homosexuality.

Posted by: Bill S | Jun 11, 2009 7:05:42 PM

Little anti-Semitism going on over there as well

Posted by: Theo | Jun 20, 2009 3:35:43 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails