RECENT  POSTS:  » 'No Law Against Woman Marrying Another Woman', says 103 years ago » What the hell is Brian Brown smoking?! » Their bullcaca will never ENDA » Here it is: 'The Manhattan Declaration' » For Gwen For Lateisha For Angie For Adolphus For Simmie For Ebony For Lawrence For Duanna For... » Far right to issue manifesto, drag Big Apple into rotten attacks » 'Daily' video: Wise beyond years vs. unwise inability to get beyond fears » Well since you did ask, Pete... » Poll: NJ will come down to those who can't/won't make up damn mind » Houston, chronically: City's 2nd anti-gay story in as many days  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/04/2009

Video: Yeah, we're friends. I mean we're not like super close, but we get along.

On last night's interview with NBC anchor Brian Williams, our president assured gay folks that we have a friend civil companion in him:

The real question: Does the constitution have a friend in the idea that tax-paying gay couples deserve a separate and unequal system, especially when such hesitation is "justified" for religious reasons? We would suggest no, believing that particular governing document would unfriend the latter, socially awkward concept faster than you can say "'We the people' means everyone."

gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-AddThis Feed Button gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

If it isn't, traditionally, the Federal Government's role to determine what marriage is, what the Hell is DOMA?

TRiG.
(I spend far too much time on American politics. Should get back to Irish stuff.)

Posted by: Timothy (TRiG) | Jun 6, 2009 10:01:17 PM

Talk to us






*Why are my comments not appearing? See the G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails