RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/27/2009

Concerned Tweeters For @goodasyou

by Jeremy Hooper

Picture 4-240

It's nice to know they're watching!

*Our complete Concerned Women For America archive

**UPDATE: Oh, they seem to have reconsidered. We don't see G-A-Y anywhere on their follow list, and their follow count is now down to 127 people. Was it something (pro-equality) we said?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I guess radical pro-homophobia advocacy groups like CWA have nothing better to do but stalk pro-equality websites. 142 followers? That's not even a respectable fringe group.

Posted by: Michael | Jul 27, 2009 9:20:33 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails