RECENT  POSTS:  » Openly anti-gay Chief Justice of AL Supreme Court vows to openly defy marriage equality » AFA's Director of Issues Analysis: LGBT activists possess 'unvarnished energy of Satan himself » Wait, FRC has been able to 'uphold natural marriage'? That's news to all non–cave dwellers! » Because when am I not calling up Fox News personalities to do my bidding? » Anti-equality conservative admits GLAAD CAP is 'smart' and 'effective' » You know what's not presidential? Like at all? » Inevitable justice temporarily delayed in Alabama » Read: Fed. judge strikes Alabama marriage ban; no stay on ruling » Derisively remembering when full equality was in 'Jeopardy!' » When all else fails, demand your letters are capitalized  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/28/2009

Gillibrand: DADT firebrand

by Jeremy Hooper

This letter just hit the G-A-Y inbox:

Picture 8-153

Hillary Clinton's shadow is certainly a formidable one. But it's good to see that as Sen. Gillibrand seeks her own time in the sun, she's remembering to respect the rainbow. We applaud the junior senator.

**EARLIER: 7/27 Asking and telling may still be out of line. But as for hearing? [G-A-Y]
7/23: Don't ask about Gillibrand's bill -- signs don't tell her that there's cloture [G-A-Y]
7/13: Clinton's successor vs. Clinton era policy [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

OK, I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt.

Posted by: Sandy | Jul 28, 2009 1:19:23 PM

I would think there's a lot more important thing on the table then some BS about the gay thing. Or maybe these left wingers are using the real issues for cover while they sneak in all there little socialist perks.

Posted by: Joe Richthammer | Jul 28, 2009 2:24:25 PM

"some BS about the gay thing."

You're certainly right, Joe: The right and far-right's BS about the gay thing certainly is unimportant. That's why Sen. Gillibrand is trying to do something about it.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Jul 28, 2009 2:31:50 PM

Being able to serve in the military is now a "socialist perq"? Usually it would be considered the opposite...

Posted by: therealistmom | Jul 28, 2009 3:42:02 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails