RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/14/2009

Left, left, left, wing, left: More Dem Sens hint at DADT hiatus

by Jeremy Hooper

200907141623-2Yesterday we told you about Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand's (D-NY) talked-about plans to introduce a measure that would put a temporary (18-month) moratorium on DADT discharges. Now comes word that Senate Majority Leader Harry (D-NV) is also on board with the promising (even if provisional) pro-equality possibility.

This from The Advocate:

Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Tuesday that he would support a measure being considered by some senators that would put an 18-month moratorium on investigations and discharges of gay soldiers in the military. But Reid said he would take the potential amendment to the Department of Defense reauthorization bill one step further.

"I would make it permanent," he added, suggesting that he would permanently suspend discharges.

Reid Supports Amendment Ending DADT [Advocate]

Now, most seem to agree that this is a long shot. But when it comes to long overdue basic fairness like this, we welcome just about any shot that isn't aimed at hurting our lives and loves.

**ALSO: Washington Blade has more: Reid endorses moratorium on 'Don't Ask'

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Sorry Dems. All I here is "blah blah blah blah blah blah"

Posted by: Jake | Jul 14, 2009 4:45:09 PM

I'm a bit confused. How is a permanant suspension any different than a full repeal?

Posted by: RainbowPhoenix | Jul 14, 2009 5:45:37 PM

RP: A suspension would mean that the nasty policy would remain on the books, current soldiers just wouldn't be investigated/discharged for it. But newbies would surely still be barred from service if they showed up to the recruitment office as an openly gay person.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Jul 14, 2009 5:48:20 PM

So a person could immediately come out after the paperwork is done with and not have to worry. This has the potential to be very amusing.

Posted by: RainbowPhoenix | Jul 14, 2009 5:58:05 PM

Well let's hope this, if successful, would be a precursor to a swift repeal.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Jul 14, 2009 6:02:39 PM

Jeremy, I'm pretty sure that under a suspension openly gay recruits could enlist. But it's an interesting question.

Posted by: Jake | Jul 14, 2009 9:18:30 PM

Actually Jake, the more I read, you're prob. right. But it will of course depend on the language of this theoretical measure -- at this point there's a lot of speculation.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Jul 14, 2009 9:38:19 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails