RECENT  POSTS:  » 'No Law Against Woman Marrying Another Woman', says 103 years ago » What the hell is Brian Brown smoking?! » Their bullcaca will never ENDA » Here it is: 'The Manhattan Declaration' » For Gwen For Lateisha For Angie For Adolphus For Simmie For Ebony For Lawrence For Duanna For... » Far right to issue manifesto, drag Big Apple into rotten attacks » 'Daily' video: Wise beyond years vs. unwise inability to get beyond fears » Well since you did ask, Pete... » Poll: NJ will come down to those who can't/won't make up damn mind » Houston, chronically: City's 2nd anti-gay story in as many days  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/09/2009

New media, NOM hardly knows ya

The Family Research Council has announced that at this year's annual anti-gay parade, the Values Voters Summit, their "new media row" will be sponsored by NOM:

Picture 1-282
Values Voters Summit '09 [another queer-hostile FRC production]

Because honesty, who knows more about new media than an organization that (a) created one of the most widely criticized, roundly mocked, deliberately fallacious, one star-rated online video in the brief history of the medium; (b) put together another ad wherein they failed on the spelling of their own pet issue; (c) epically failed at Facebook organizing,;(d) allowed their organizational domain name to go unpurchased so that others could do with it whatever they wish (which originally meant linking it to the KKK's page, though that has since been changed); and (e) who, despite their crazy amount of national PR, only have a relatively paltry 909 Twitter followers (a bulk of whom are actually pro-LGBT folks keeping tabs on their foe)?

When it comes to "new media," NOM would seem to be as avant garde as the abacus. But then again, when it comes to gay-centric "values," the Family Research Council's are as peace-loving as those of Anita Bryant's more intolerant cousin.

gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-AddThis Feed Button gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Well, if they practice Bronze Age religion and medieval politics, of course the folks at NOM are going to look downright modern by comparison. :-)

Personally, I am *just fine* with NOM spreading their new media techniques to like-minded organizations.

Posted by: GreenEyedLilo | Jul 9, 2009 9:50:05 AM

They still have Caribou Barbie and (Dethroned/Defrocked/Sashless/Formerly Known as Miss California/All of the Above) Barbie listed as "invited" but noncommittal speakers. But, I didn't see Magaglagher, or her equally offensive protege Brian Brown on that mugshot (hall of shame) board.

Posted by: Dick Mills | Jul 9, 2009 11:28:31 AM

"...avant garde as the abacus." I love it!

And you're right. Most people I see following @nomwtweets are just doing so for the ability to fire back replies whenever that corpulent hag Maggie Gallagher wanders too near a keyboard.

Posted by: Garet | Jul 9, 2009 3:27:27 PM

Talk to us






*Why are my comments not appearing? See the G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails