RECENT  POSTS:  » Photo: Stop! Turn around! Don't let NOM force you onto the dead-end pier that is their cause! » One day, two country singers—zero closets » Fringe pro-discrimination group thinks it can stop companies from sponsoring HRC event; adorable » Video: Josh Duggar promoting civil inequality for thousands of grown kids (and counting) » Brian Brown's focus on Kansas, Gov. Brownback shows how much of a political game this is for him » Tiny fraction of North Carolina magistrates choose to free up their days rather than serve local gays » Video: Reality star Josh Duggar leads sad little inequality rally in Little Rock, AR » READ: Federal judge strikes Montana's discriminatory marriage ban » Major global brand P&G comes out for marriage equality » In 2013, HRC went red for equality; NOM just went in the red  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/16/2009

Video: S.S. Marriage

by Jeremy Hooper

Of course Judge Sotomayor's not going to reveal anything here. She'd be silly too. But she seems to understand the fundamentals, and seems, via her immediate reaction to Sen. Coburn, to understand the desire by some to trap her with his line of questioning.

There's no need on her part to stress the things that should go without saying (as in, "I respect all people, but..."), and her comfort with (and seeming expectation of) taking up a marriage equality case is fairly apparent. Overall, this answer is pleasing to us. What do you think?

**SEE ALSO: HRC has more of her marriage-centric exchanges: As Sotomayor Hearings Continue, Marriage Keeps Coming Up [HRC Backstory]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Am I the only one who isn't tech-savvy enough to figure out how to play this video?

Posted by: Marce Wyzdyx | Jul 16, 2009 2:18:36 PM

I'm not a lawyer, as the majority of these committee members are, but even I can see the stupidity of these hypothetical legal questions.

"Do you think a Supreme Court decision to legalize same sex marriage would be creating law or interpreting law?"

Well, Senator Genius, I'd have to read the court's opinion to see how they arrived at their decision. But since there has been no such decision, your question has no premise.

Posted by: Jake | Jul 16, 2009 4:36:40 PM

She is a very wise woman. Great video clip! It shows that she has a very discerning spirit and thoroughly thinks before she speaks.

Snaps to Obama for picking this one!

Posted by: Beej the Pink Sheep | Jul 16, 2009 9:20:17 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails