RECENT  POSTS:  » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry » Video: AFA prez expounds on organization's movement-destructive ad by adding even more religious fervor » NOM resorts to blatant lying in its 2015 #March4Marriage materials » NOM coalition partner: America will fall unless you March For Marriage » AFA helps SCOTUS see that opposition to *civil* marriage equality is all about religious fervor » Video: Did this Texas 'biblical marriage' rally assemble least diverse crowd in recorded human history?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/16/2009

Video: S.S. Marriage

by Jeremy Hooper

Of course Judge Sotomayor's not going to reveal anything here. She'd be silly too. But she seems to understand the fundamentals, and seems, via her immediate reaction to Sen. Coburn, to understand the desire by some to trap her with his line of questioning.

There's no need on her part to stress the things that should go without saying (as in, "I respect all people, but..."), and her comfort with (and seeming expectation of) taking up a marriage equality case is fairly apparent. Overall, this answer is pleasing to us. What do you think?

**SEE ALSO: HRC has more of her marriage-centric exchanges: As Sotomayor Hearings Continue, Marriage Keeps Coming Up [HRC Backstory]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Am I the only one who isn't tech-savvy enough to figure out how to play this video?

Posted by: Marce Wyzdyx | Jul 16, 2009 2:18:36 PM

I'm not a lawyer, as the majority of these committee members are, but even I can see the stupidity of these hypothetical legal questions.

"Do you think a Supreme Court decision to legalize same sex marriage would be creating law or interpreting law?"

Well, Senator Genius, I'd have to read the court's opinion to see how they arrived at their decision. But since there has been no such decision, your question has no premise.

Posted by: Jake | Jul 16, 2009 4:36:40 PM

She is a very wise woman. Great video clip! It shows that she has a very discerning spirit and thoroughly thinks before she speaks.

Snaps to Obama for picking this one!

Posted by: Beej the Pink Sheep | Jul 16, 2009 9:20:17 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails