RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Voices from our pro-equality future (present?) » Anti-gay orgs continue to offend children of single parents, gay parents, more » Apple CEO gives 'substantial' sum to HRC's southern state project; may or may not have used ApplePay » Conservative proposes new way for vendors to tell gay customers they don't care for them » NOM versus David Koch » Anti-equality baseball player calls reporter 'a prick' for asking about his anti-equality advocacy » Audio: Josh Duggar defends discrimination, invalidates own point » Audio: AFA's Fischer names 'homosexual agenda' as 'greatest threat to liberty' in American history » Audio: AFA Radio caller calls for executing gays; FRC-employed host doesn't even challenge him, much less condemn » NOM president's other organization is 'in trouble' (his words) too  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/21/2009

FRC finally questions a Dubya

by Jeremy Hooper

NOWBecause of the progressive organization's support for equality, the Family Research Council's Tom McCluskey asks of his readers, "What DOES the “W” Stand for in NOW?":

NOW, formerly known as the National Organization for Women, has come out strongly for gay “marriage” and overturning the Defense of Marriage Act.
What DOES the “W” Stand for in NOW? [FRC 'Cloakroom' blog]

You know, because equality doesn't do anything for women. Oh no. Not the lesbian or bisexual women who want to marry. Not the heterosexual-yet-allied women who want their friends, family members, and neighbors to have the rights they deserve. Not the straight women who unwittingly marry gay men who were pressured to enter into loveless unions. Not the little girls who could and should be taught that prescient wedding visions can extend beyond their own female-centric, hetero-focused daydreams. No, no -- marriage equality is only for the penis possessors.

[/unabashed snark]

Seriously, Mr. McCluskey: Your real question, should not regard what the "w" stands for -- it should be about the crucial injustices for which principled groups like NOW will never stand! Fortunately for us, civil bias against HUMAN BEINGS is one of their must-nots. The same sort of bias that your own side's so-called Concerned Women For America has put on their own unfortunate list of supposed women's interests, then exported to any gender willing to listen.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

So.. can anyone remember the last time an actual woman spoke for Concerned Women of America?

Posted by: penguinsaur | Sep 21, 2009 1:05:17 PM

Concerned Women of America, formerly known as NOT NOW, I have a headache!

Posted by: Dick Mills | Sep 21, 2009 2:43:17 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails