RECENT  POSTS:  » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


Oh noes, it's the gays? OH 'nos' outnumbered by 'ayes'

by Jeremy Hooper

Oh Flag L-2Good news out of the Buckeye State:

After years of collecting dust in various legislative committees, a bill that prohibits employment or housing discrimination based on sexual orientation passed a divided Ohio House [on Tuesday].
Gay-rights bill passes Ohio House [Columbus Dispatch]

Unfortunately, the bill is expected to face a much tougher road in the GOP-controlled Senate, where some are chomping at the proverbial bit to kill what they call "special rights" protections. Because you know: What heterosexual doesn't casually retain a job and/or apartment and think to themselves, "Gee, this benign acceptance of my core being is so damn special"? We've never heard any of them say it, but they must -- right?

Or is it just that the journey from "everyday civil rights" to "SPECIAL PROTECTIONS™" requires a long-persecuted minority, an opportunistic political movement, and a shrewd usage of code-wording (to mask true intent) in order to foster its fallacious viability? [::ding, ding, ding, ding, ding::]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails