RECENT  POSTS:  » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry » Video: AFA prez expounds on organization's movement-destructive ad by adding even more religious fervor  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/16/2009

Oh noes, it's the gays? OH 'nos' outnumbered by 'ayes'

by Jeremy Hooper

Oh Flag L-2Good news out of the Buckeye State:

After years of collecting dust in various legislative committees, a bill that prohibits employment or housing discrimination based on sexual orientation passed a divided Ohio House [on Tuesday].
Gay-rights bill passes Ohio House [Columbus Dispatch]

Unfortunately, the bill is expected to face a much tougher road in the GOP-controlled Senate, where some are chomping at the proverbial bit to kill what they call "special rights" protections. Because you know: What heterosexual doesn't casually retain a job and/or apartment and think to themselves, "Gee, this benign acceptance of my core being is so damn special"? We've never heard any of them say it, but they must -- right?

Or is it just that the journey from "everyday civil rights" to "SPECIAL PROTECTIONS™" requires a long-persecuted minority, an opportunistic political movement, and a shrewd usage of code-wording (to mask true intent) in order to foster its fallacious viability? [::ding, ding, ding, ding, ding::]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails