RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/25/2009

Reversal of (un)fortun(at)e: Karma bill now only one that WBC owes

by Jeremy Hooper

As much as it pains us to say: We actually agree with this ruling:

A federal appeals court reversed a $5 million judgment (originally an $11 million judgment, which was reduced) against Fred Phelps' Westboro Baptist Church, ruling that the church's protest outside the funeral of an Iraq veteran was free speech
Free Speech: Court Reverses $5 Million Ruling Against Gay, Jew, and Soldier-Hating Westboro Baptist Church Protect [Towleroad

We went on record when this judgment first came down, saying that it was flawed. And we still believe it almost two years later. Just because the unbelievably offensive Westboro is our nation's most disturbing example of free speech, that is not enough a reason to apply a legal double standard. If we want to say this, freely, fairly, and parodically...

Screen Shot 2009-09-25 At 9.55.29 Am-1

...then we have to let them suck in public, just as long as they stay within the parameters of law.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

So they don't owe anything? Now on one hand I agree we have to protect their free speech as much as we hate them but this was a bloody foolish ruling. They violated the law SOMEHOW and should have to have at least paid the $5 million for pain and suffering. OUR side would have to...

Posted by: Jake | Sep 25, 2009 8:08:00 PM

I wonder if Bush appointed the judges responsible for this being overturned.

Posted by: libhomo | Sep 27, 2009 4:06:31 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails