RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/08/2009

They of course want her for her healthcare policy acumen

by Jeremy Hooper

Well it looks like they finally got her. After weeks of listing the former Miss California as merely an invited speaker for their intensely anti-gay Values Voters Summit (to be held 9/18-9/20 in DC), the Family Research Council has now switched Carrie Prejean's status to "confirmed":

Screen Shot 2009-09-08 At 5.49.43 Pm-1
Values Voters Summit [FRC]

Geez. Soon even Anita B. will have to look rightward to see Ms. "Opposite Marriage"!

We'll have to wait and see what Carrie will have to say to the gathered masses (she's scheduled to speak at 11:40 on 9/19). Though we'd imagine the speech will start with something like: "Dear like-minded choir who will fully accept the idea that I'm some sort of a martyr even though I'm the one who has gone on a hostile tear against others' civil liberties..."

**SEE ALSO: Our complete Values Voters archive

**SEE ALSO: Max Blumenthal's eye-opening assessment of the '07 soiree:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I wonder if she'll be wearing a top

Posted by: Timothy Kincaid | Sep 9, 2009 2:23:19 PM

She should get a sash that says, "Ms. Opposite Marriage", since she can't wear the California one, any longer.

But, this brings sooooo many questions to mind: I wonder if Perkins has a tiara for her? Maybe she is getting more plastic surgery paid for by the VVs in exchange for her appearance? Maybe a third boob? How much does that gig pay? How much will you bet that she is there (probably with Chuck Norris in tow) hocking her soon to be ghostwritten book?? You've gotta love capitalism!

Posted by: Dick Mills | Sep 9, 2009 3:02:47 PM

I've said this before and will again--I would love to hear any of these other participants bitch and complain about the "immodesty" of non-conservative Christian celebrities or average young women now.

Posted by: GreenEyedLilo | Sep 10, 2009 12:16:41 AM

They think they're christian; god is not mocked, right Carrie?

Posted by: nikkon | Sep 10, 2009 1:46:00 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails