RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: AFA's Fischer urges FLOTUS to fight obesity by fighting lesbians' sexual orientation » Um, but he lost to another pro-equality candidate, Tony » Video: Man misapplies personal trauma to sexual orientation science » WND's editor fundamentally misunderstands nondiscrimination law (part 3 of 3) » Video: Why is this shockingly anti-gay (among other things) speech happening in a Connecticut public school? » Fined NY event space to host same-sex wedding receptions (*but no ceremonies for anyone) » Another day, another far-right pastor pushing Christians to civil war » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/08/2009

Why should Sonja have a cow when she can get the 'Milk' for free?

by Jeremy Hooper

It's one thing for our opposition to oppose California's Harvey Milk Day bill. It's quite another for them to outright lie in the name of political opportunism.

This claim comes from Focus on the Family's Citizenlink:

Prop 8 spokeswoman Sonja Eddings Brown said California's children deserve better.

"It's not right," she said. "They deserve to be able to determine who they are without the interference of adult agendas or political agendas. Not only is it expensive and silly, it's wrong."

Family Advocates Push For Veto of 'Harvey Milk Day' [Citizenlink]

Expensive? Well that is a sellable talking point. But the big problem with Sonja's logic? Well, that Sonja-Eddingsthe Milk Day bill comes at no cost -- NO COST! -- to the state! It's specified in the bill that any exercises related to the day are to "be integrated into the regular school program, and be conducted by the school or institution within the amount otherwise budgeted for educational programs." In fact, bill sponsor Mark Leno made a point to ensure that the bill would not have a financial impact, considering the state's current fiscal climate.

So this "expensive" claim is nothing more than a cheap attack from a political movement that has more than proven themselves willing and even eager to resort to the same. It is this misrepresentative "adult agenda" that is truly silly. And it's the one that California parents should truly fear!

**Don't forget 2 call @schwarzenegger in support of Harvey Milk Day bill -- 916-445-2841. U don't even have 2 talk 2 anyone.**

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Sonja Eddings Brown certainly deserves to have more than a mere 52 members on her Facebook fan page:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=35204617771

If only because thanks to Sonja, I got the chance to make a new friend, one of her former students, who reports that Sonja Eddings Brown is Rather Unpleasant

http://theacademicvagrant.wordpress.com/2008/11/08/sonja-eddings-brown-is-rather-unpleasant/

Posted by: LdChino | Sep 8, 2009 9:22:57 AM

The fundies are also up in arms because it will force children to learn about a liar and a sexual predator.

I remember learning about a bunch of rapists when I was in school (American aristocratic slave owners).

I remember learning about a bunch of rapists and genocidal maniacs (insert name of European explorer here).

I remember learning about an adulterer and a liar/criminal when I was in school (Kennedy and Nixon).

So what's the problem?

Posted by: stojef | Sep 8, 2009 8:12:15 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails