RECENT  POSTS:  » Riiiiiiight, FRC. And 'Desperate Housewives' is still TV's hot new show, too » After death do us part: Indignity of Idaho's marriage ban threatens lesbian veteran's final wishes » NOM's Chair to Oregon: We have a right to tell courts our personal, conservative Catholic opinions! » Nice try, anti-equality movement, but the lesbian 'throuple' story makes our argument, not yours » Jonah Goldberg can't see the hornets' nest for its hornets » Video: Male on mail » Jodie Foster in 2013: 'I am'; Jodie Foster in 2014: 'I do' » AFA promotes its new app in only way it knows how » Robert Oscar Lopez says I perform 'psychological operations routine' on him when I quote his own words from his own web site » Matt Barber's ever-classy site suggests gay people are literally crushing fellow humans  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/23/2009

Audio: Can't 'Yes on 1' be factual about anything?

by Jeremy Hooper

Because her name's Monique (MO-NEEK), not Monica:

Anti-'mo marriage and anti-MO names? Well that's an unfortunate M.O. Think we'll vote NO.

**EARLIER: We've already picked apart the ad's claims. Find that here.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Exactly the same yellow-and-blue graphics used in California Prop 8 (for yard signs).

Posted by: roscoe | Oct 23, 2009 6:51:40 PM

"Now it's our kids who will suffer."

I choke up every time I hear these douchebags say something like that. I can't even count the number of times I was raped as a child (By ministers and various other so-called "Christian" men, no less), and the very thought of implying that a child will "suffer" because of the pro-fairness, anti-bullying, pro-diversity education in public schools which may or may not arise from the equal right of two men to sign a contract saying they're committed to each other - It's absolute bullshit, and these people deserve no - NO - dignity for not putting their money where their mouth is and being REAL advocates for children.

Yes on 1: Stop using children as political pawns. Focus your energies on ACTUAL child concerns, like abuse. If you ever stop seeing it as a moral imperative to rule over others' sex lives, that is.

Btw, I'm straight.

Posted by: lolculturewar | Oct 23, 2009 8:11:52 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails