RECENT  POSTS:  » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/14/2009

Eight's not enough -- we'll fight till eleventh hour

by Jeremy Hooper

And so it goes:

A federal judge refused today to dismiss a constitutional challenge to Proposition 8, ruling the voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage raised legal and factual issues that required a trial.
Judge refuses to dismiss challenge to Prop. 8 [LA Times]

Our victory is inevitable. Never forget that.

**SEE ALSO: Chris Geidner's take: Judge Walker: Prop 8 Challenge to Continue to Trial [Law Dork]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

On to the trial. Yep, no question of eventual outcome. Especially now that we have another whole layer of 'marriage' here in CA.
The GOV signed the bill that legalizes all SSM performed outside of CA, too, in other states, or in other countries.
The problem is, if it was performed after November 4, 2008, it cannot be called a marriage. Heaven only knows what its called. But all the rights are present.

Posted by: LOrion | Oct 14, 2009 5:29:54 PM

Only have one thing to say about that... Awesome!

Posted by: Sam | Oct 14, 2009 9:10:52 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails