RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/05/2009

Video: Uhm, is WA voting on domestic partnerships or communion wafers?!

by Jeremy Hooper

In Washington state, our opposition isn't even trying to hide their wholly religious reasons for rejecting CIVIL domestic partnerships:

The biggest shock? That Adam & Eve have such '70s era hair! We really had no clue that Farrah Fawcett and Lee Majors were such Garden of Eden trendsetters!

The second biggest shock? That the Reject 71 campaign would so decidedly alienate so many voters! We know the creationist, "traditional wedding," narrowly defined faith communities are their bread and butter -- but doesn't it take a few other seeds to bear socially conservative fruit?

But whatever. Far be it from us to compain if they want to help us...


APPROVE 71!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

They're on to you, JH! The message showing up on the video says, "The owner of this content has not given permission to embed it on this domain!" I guess GOD hasn't even approved of your usage of his content.

But that guy with Eve in the garden has some pretty nice legs and a really short dress!

Posted by: Dick Mills | Oct 5, 2009 12:26:15 PM

Anyone else notice that the only other comment on their own video is from their own account? At least they're not trying to hide their sock puppetry.

Posted by: Marcus | Oct 5, 2009 12:29:53 PM

Have you seen the tags? They are hilarious!
* anti-gay
* anti-equality
* anti-LGBT
* bans
* discrimination
* biased
* hurts families
* bad for washington
* preserves inequality
* bad for the state
* do the fair thing: approve 71!

Posted by: Piper | Oct 5, 2009 2:01:44 PM

Only Protect Marriage Washington contacts are able to comment.

Posted by: SammySeattle | Oct 5, 2009 2:21:21 PM

Uhmmmm... I'm cornfused.

They're going to protect gawd-given, holier-than-thou marriage...

By voting down a law that is not about marriage?

I tried conservative Christianity a couple times, and flunked out both times. Apparently, that was in the best interest of both of us!

Posted by: Bose | Oct 5, 2009 9:31:18 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails