RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/05/2009

Video: Uhm, is WA voting on domestic partnerships or communion wafers?!

by Jeremy Hooper

In Washington state, our opposition isn't even trying to hide their wholly religious reasons for rejecting CIVIL domestic partnerships:

The biggest shock? That Adam & Eve have such '70s era hair! We really had no clue that Farrah Fawcett and Lee Majors were such Garden of Eden trendsetters!

The second biggest shock? That the Reject 71 campaign would so decidedly alienate so many voters! We know the creationist, "traditional wedding," narrowly defined faith communities are their bread and butter -- but doesn't it take a few other seeds to bear socially conservative fruit?

But whatever. Far be it from us to compain if they want to help us...


APPROVE 71!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

They're on to you, JH! The message showing up on the video says, "The owner of this content has not given permission to embed it on this domain!" I guess GOD hasn't even approved of your usage of his content.

But that guy with Eve in the garden has some pretty nice legs and a really short dress!

Posted by: Dick Mills | Oct 5, 2009 12:26:15 PM

Anyone else notice that the only other comment on their own video is from their own account? At least they're not trying to hide their sock puppetry.

Posted by: Marcus | Oct 5, 2009 12:29:53 PM

Have you seen the tags? They are hilarious!
* anti-gay
* anti-equality
* anti-LGBT
* bans
* discrimination
* biased
* hurts families
* bad for washington
* preserves inequality
* bad for the state
* do the fair thing: approve 71!

Posted by: Piper | Oct 5, 2009 2:01:44 PM

Only Protect Marriage Washington contacts are able to comment.

Posted by: SammySeattle | Oct 5, 2009 2:21:21 PM

Uhmmmm... I'm cornfused.

They're going to protect gawd-given, holier-than-thou marriage...

By voting down a law that is not about marriage?

I tried conservative Christianity a couple times, and flunked out both times. Apparently, that was in the best interest of both of us!

Posted by: Bose | Oct 5, 2009 9:31:18 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails