RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/05/2009

Video: Uhm, is WA voting on domestic partnerships or communion wafers?!

by Jeremy Hooper

In Washington state, our opposition isn't even trying to hide their wholly religious reasons for rejecting CIVIL domestic partnerships:

The biggest shock? That Adam & Eve have such '70s era hair! We really had no clue that Farrah Fawcett and Lee Majors were such Garden of Eden trendsetters!

The second biggest shock? That the Reject 71 campaign would so decidedly alienate so many voters! We know the creationist, "traditional wedding," narrowly defined faith communities are their bread and butter -- but doesn't it take a few other seeds to bear socially conservative fruit?

But whatever. Far be it from us to compain if they want to help us...


APPROVE 71!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

They're on to you, JH! The message showing up on the video says, "The owner of this content has not given permission to embed it on this domain!" I guess GOD hasn't even approved of your usage of his content.

But that guy with Eve in the garden has some pretty nice legs and a really short dress!

Posted by: Dick Mills | Oct 5, 2009 12:26:15 PM

Anyone else notice that the only other comment on their own video is from their own account? At least they're not trying to hide their sock puppetry.

Posted by: Marcus | Oct 5, 2009 12:29:53 PM

Have you seen the tags? They are hilarious!
* anti-gay
* anti-equality
* anti-LGBT
* bans
* discrimination
* biased
* hurts families
* bad for washington
* preserves inequality
* bad for the state
* do the fair thing: approve 71!

Posted by: Piper | Oct 5, 2009 2:01:44 PM

Only Protect Marriage Washington contacts are able to comment.

Posted by: SammySeattle | Oct 5, 2009 2:21:21 PM

Uhmmmm... I'm cornfused.

They're going to protect gawd-given, holier-than-thou marriage...

By voting down a law that is not about marriage?

I tried conservative Christianity a couple times, and flunked out both times. Apparently, that was in the best interest of both of us!

Posted by: Bose | Oct 5, 2009 9:31:18 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails