RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/18/2009

And now in DOMA will inevitably become DOA news...

by Jeremy Hooper
A federal judge today ordered compensation for a Los Angeles couple denied spousal benefits by the federal government because they are gay men.

U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Stephen Reinhardt deemed the denial of healthcare and other benefits to the spouse of federal public defender Brad Levenson to be a violation of the Constitution's guarantee of due process and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, which is prohibited by California state law.

Levenson married his longtime partner, Tony Sears, on July 12, 2008, during the five-month period when same-sex marriage was legal in California.
KEEP READING: Judge orders compensation for gay couple denied benefits [L.A. Now (LA Times)]

DOMA is kind of like a wisdom tooth. Despite its clever name, everyone impacted (i.e. the whole of America) will be more defended from decay once the nasty sucker is yanked.

**EARLIER:
Reinhardt issued an order in this case back in February: Ding dong, the DOMA's...well, maimed [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Now we just have to hope the SCOTUS doesn't overrule these kinds of things.

Posted by: RainbowPhoenix | Nov 18, 2009 6:25:58 PM

Wow, correct-use-of-the-word-impacted pun... well played, Jeremy.

Posted by: DN | Nov 18, 2009 6:56:45 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails