RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/04/2009

Our opponents 'protect marriage'; we protect our Band-Aid supply

by Jeremy Hooper

In the past, we've noted Bishop Harry Jackson's love for invoking harsh words like "Armageddon" when referring to gay activists and marriage equality. His latest just might take the hyperbolic cake:

In future races, religious people are going to start going after people's political careers. In D.C., some very vulnerable black councilmen went along with the city council, and some of these guys will not be sitting in those chairs in 2010 elections. Many in our coalition are wising up, looking for candidates. Political action committees are going to be formed. You're going to see a bloodletting that is going to mark a new style of engagement for people who are against same-sex marriage.
D.C.'s Anti-Gay-Marriage Crusader Ponders This Week's Loss [Gilgoff -- U.S. News]

Wow, a "bloodletting"? Personally we like to avoid invoking imagery of humans being drained of their life force whenever we engage in political discourse. But what do we need know? We're not evangelical reverends like Mr. Jackson.

*Here's our favorite bloodletting. It's almost as logical as Mr. Jackson's:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

"You're going to see a bloodletting..."

Every time that these guys open their mouths, it becomes more apparent that they truly fear hate-crimes legislation, because they go out of their way to use incendiary rhetoric meant to incite violence.

Posted by: Dick Mills | Dec 4, 2009 2:46:25 PM

Here is link to our CA Referendum movement to 'Protect Traditional Marriage' the
2010 Marriage Protection Act.

http://tinyurl.com/yk4z6po

Here is latest notice: Media update: We are re-situated on "The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer" for around 2:50 p.m. PST. We're late in the hour, and if another Christmas-tree-related story comes up, we can get bumped again. I also just did an interview at lunch with ABC 7 San Francisco/LA. I should be on at 5:30 p.m. LA and 6:00 p.m. San Francisco -- I can get bumped there as well. But we'll see.

Posted by: LOrion | Dec 4, 2009 5:11:53 PM

The best way to protect traditional marriage is to make people get a 4 year higher education before they are eligible for marriage. Just like getting a license to do hair, you must go through school to be eligible.

Posted by: Mykelb | Dec 7, 2009 11:27:03 AM

Marriage is between a man and a woman. Heterosexual couples produce children. Gay couples produce AIDs. Know the facts.

If I had it my way I would like to outlaw sodomy completely.

Posted by: MotorCityTough | Jan 1, 2010 1:30:52 AM

I will fight the gay movement till I die. I used to be able to tolerate gay people until you all started shoving your gay agenda down our throats. Not in my country or town. NO GAYS. NO LESBIANS. NO TRANSGENDERS. NO PEDOPHILES. NO BESTIALITY. NO FAIRYS.

Posted by: MotorCityTough | Jan 1, 2010 1:38:00 AM

Oh MCT, you charmer!

Posted by: G-A-Y | Jan 1, 2010 9:32:13 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails