RECENT  POSTS:  » NBC analyst Tony Dungy says he wouldn't have drafted Michael Sam » NOM becomes even more of a generalized anti-LGBT animus organization » Sure, NOM—I'll play your game!! » Bryan Fischer: POTUS 'stood on the graves' of Malaysia Air victims 'to promote the legitimacy of sexual deviancy' » Legal profession made up of ideologues, demands legal ideologue » FRC's senior fellow for exporting/criminalizing gay people bemoan's discrimination's dwindling acceptance » (ARCHIVED): President signs executive order protecting LGBT workers » That discriminatory Colorado baker won't make Halloween cakes either » Catholic Bishops again go after basic workplace protections for LGBT people » FL anti-gay activist, head of anti-gay Boy Scouts group says marriage inequality is 'issue worth dying for'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/08/2009

Uneven vs. Steven: NJ anti-gays find their fall gay

by Jeremy Hooper

Jerseyequal-3New Jersey marriage equality isn't really about the thousands of gay and lesbian Garden Staters who are denied basic fairness. It's not about the 2006 Supreme Court decision that demanded legal parity. It isn't about yesterday's hearing, where there couldn't have been a more drastic difference between the pro-equality side's heartfelt testimony and the anti-LGBT side's illogical condemnations. No, no -- none of those things are of concern.

So what is it all about? Well, to hear Focus on the Family and the New Jersey Family Policy Council tell it, the entire procedure is designed for no greater purpose than to appease Garden State Equality's Steven Goldstein:


*Source: Gay Marriage Vote in NJ [FOF]

Because they always need a scapegoat. Be it Tim Gill, President Obama, or Spongebob Squarepants, these professional "pro-family" activists have to create some sort of figurehead who they can cast in the aggressor role, so as to detach the debate from the public at large. Since they want, nay, need to mask their own sweepingly discriminatory work in order to stay financed, they've adopted a strategy where they (a) pinpoint one person or group who is supposedly interfering with the natural order of things, (b) cast themselves as the victims of that particular person or group's supposedly underhanded dealings, then (c) focus their supporters' ire towards that one targeted place. The goal is obvious: To pull focus from the countless folks who suffer at the cruel hand of the "pro-family," and instead place it on the one "whipping queer" who they claim has unfairly created the "fight."

It's smart, as far as unduly unrighteous tactics go.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Len Deo? Who the eff is Len Deo and what gives him the right to decide NJ family policy?

Posted by: johnozed | Dec 8, 2009 12:34:57 PM

"It's smart, as far as unduly unrighteous tactics go."

Hmmm... Can you give an example of a "duly" unrighteous tactic?

Posted by: Bill Ware | Dec 8, 2009 3:30:04 PM

It's a world gone mad.

Posted by: Em | Dec 8, 2009 3:36:52 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails