RECENT  POSTS:  » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open » Video: 'Ex-gay' speaker at upcoming ERLC summit equates talking to gay people with talking to cancer patients » GLAAD: Mainstream media is catching on to NOM's broader agenda » FRC's Values Voter Summit puts anti-gay bakers on a marriage panel; so we won, basically » GOP front group NOM raising money for a GOP US Senate  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/21/2010

A very wrong ENGAGEment

by Jeremy Hooper

Something we've never talked about before on this site: The annoyingly ironic fact that the media company who (quietly) designed ProtectMarriage.com's web campaign works under the moniker:

Screen Shot 2010-01-21 At 1.55.49 Pm-1
Engage [GOP communications firm]

Ya know, because it's always nice to have a communications company fully bear out the concept that you plan to forcibly invalidate for countless gay couples. What, ProtectMarriage -- was "Live In Peace Inc." unavailable or something? Ugh.

Among Engage's other clients: U.S. Congressman Bob Goodlatte (whose promotional images, strangely, exist in a few protectmarriage.com subdirectories). We just wish they could've stuck with the one "good latte" and not moved onto an overheated drink that more resembles a CrappyCupofPissWater.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Yeah engage should proudly advertised that they did web design for them.
Anyways Engage actually does work for moderate to inclusive Republicans as well http://www.campbell.org. I do not think they have a litmus test on who they do work for.

Posted by: Matt from California | Jan 21, 2010 7:35:02 PM

I'm not so sure about that, Matt. Patrick Ruffini, one of the founders of Engage, is a GOP strategist/politico.

Moderated Republicans, yes. But I don't think they carry any Democratic clients.

Which is fine, of course. But it might have been a nice thing to know during the campaign -- that a GOP comm. firm was fueling the web component of this supposedly non-partisan matter.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Jan 21, 2010 7:49:35 PM

Chino Blanco scratched the surface during the campaign, connecting Ruffini to an icontribute component on the site:

http://www.chinoblanco.com/2008/09/protect-marriage-campaign-to-release.html

But as far as I can tell, the company connection was never made.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Jan 21, 2010 7:53:24 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails