RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/29/2010

Another Carlin who might make you wanna use seven dirty words

by Jeremy Hooper

Screen Shot 2010-01-29 At 12.15.22 Pm-1He's the administrator of a Christian school. He's a Republican. And in Indiana, he's the senator who is seeking to change the state's constitution so that it more fully turns into a weapon against loving gay couples.

Meet Carlin Yoder and his hurtful handiwork:

he Indiana Senate revived a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages Thursday, approving the measure and sending it to the House, where it's likely to meet a quick death.

The 38-10 vote marked the fourth time the Senate has approved such a provision, which must be approved by two separately elected legislatures and voters before being placed into the state's founding document.


State law already bans same-sex marriages, but conservatives have pushed for the amendment, arguing that it would prevent activist judges from overturning the statute.

"Marriage is one of the foundations of our society," said Sen. Carlin Yoder, R-Middlebury, who authored the amendment. "It is something that I firmly believe needs to be protected."

Senate OKs same-sex marriage ban [Indianapolis Star]

Blah, blah, blah. Feed the discriminatory ideas through the far-right talking point machine, out comes a tired old quip. So boring. So anti-intellectual. So needless. So pervasive to young psyches. So destined for ignobility.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

To the senators who voted yes on this amendment, shame on you for wanting to write discrimination into the constitution.

To the senators who voted no on this amendment and to the democratic majority in the House of Representatives, thank you for standing up for equal rights.

Posted by: Sam | Jan 29, 2010 4:37:40 PM

Would somebody please explain to me how allowing gays to marry and enjoy all the rights that the straight community enjoy, how would this harm traditional marriage?
What do they want to protect it from?

Posted by: William Weeks | Jan 30, 2010 7:03:24 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails