RECENT  POSTS:  » #RFRA and a movement that shirks responsibility (almost) as much as it shirks equality » Audio: Limbaugh admits #RFRA fight is about same-sex marriage; links homosexuality to bestiality » Sen Schumer, federal #RFRA coauthor, knocks down lie that Indiana's version is the same » Video: I can't fathom invoking concentration camps in my political discourse. But Glenn Beck on the other hand... » Get a load of this double-talk from the Family Research Council #RFRA #Indiana » NOM admits 'religious freedom' bills are about discriminating against same-sex couples; thanks, NOM » 'Indianapolis Star' to Governor Pence: FIX THIS NOW » Bill Maher's monologue on dialogue he'd prefer remain a monologue » Video: Even Michael Steele thinks Indiana law is too broad; Ryan T. Anderson constantly interrupts, still loses » Watch Gov. Pence heap praise on lobbying group that admitted #SB101 was all about same-sex marriage  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/19/2010

Electing to discriminate: SD mayor on govt-peeps correlation

by Jeremy Hooper
Screen Shot 2010-01-19 At 5.28.11 Pm-1
"If government tolerates discrimination against anyone it is very easy for citizens to do the same thing"
-San Diego's Republican mayor, Jerry Sanders, testifying at the Prop 8 federal trial

Simple. True. And far too unacknowledged.

When the tone-setters crow discordant notes, their song hits home with everyone. For LGBT people, those hits turn all too literal all too often!

Just be nice. Or even decent. Neither are nearly as hard as being an ass.

*More on Sanders' testimony: Sanders Admits Prejudice In Prop 8 Court Case Testimony [10 News]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

G-A-Y nerd here thinks that the quote should be in blue. He's definately a blue.

Posted by: Sykler | Jan 19, 2010 5:58:09 PM

Jeremy, are you sure that should be red?

He is a supporter of same sex marriage.

Posted by: Sam | Jan 19, 2010 6:01:10 PM

God, I've been so bad about doing that lately!

Fixed.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Jan 19, 2010 6:03:21 PM

What may be equally as telling is that he never considered that his anti-marriage-equality decision was based on animus, until he saw the hurt that his decision was causing to the LGBTs that he counts as friends. Upon reconsidering his long held position that DPs and CUs are adequate, he discovered that he (himself) had come to his conclusion based on personal prejudice. Personal prejudice that was so ingrained that he didn't even realize that it was influencing his decision. Very important for eliminating the "rational" basis for Prop H8.

And, on the red/blue issue: Is Red for Republican?? If so, then he is still a Republican, right?? Just not a knuckle dragging Neanderthal...

Posted by: Dick Mills | Jan 19, 2010 9:07:57 PM

Dick: No, this site's blue is for enlightened/progressive/ass-kicky. It's nonpartisan.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Jan 19, 2010 9:16:03 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails