RECENT  POSTS:  » One of America's most anti-gay organizations rallies for the Duggars; because of course they would » Photo: Stop! Turn around! Don't let NOM force you onto the dead-end pier that is their cause! » One day, two country singers—zero closets » Fringe pro-discrimination group thinks it can stop companies from sponsoring HRC event; adorable » Video: Josh Duggar promoting civil inequality for thousands of grown kids (and counting) » Brian Brown's focus on Kansas, Gov. Brownback shows how much of a political game this is for him » Tiny fraction of North Carolina magistrates choose to free up their days rather than serve local gays » Video: Reality star Josh Duggar leads sad little inequality rally in Little Rock, AR » READ: Federal judge strikes Montana's discriminatory marriage ban » Major global brand P&G comes out for marriage equality  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/07/2010

Video: Garden State vs. soil unfit for growth

by Jeremy Hooper


Debate On Gay Marriage Bill [Fox NY]

**EARLIER: Len Deo says marriage inequality is as natural as gravity

*Len Deo reveals that his group essentially launched the National Organization For Marriage

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Len Deo: "I was in the courtroom when Judge Linda Feinberg said basically every gay and lesbian person in New Jersey does have the right to marry a person of the opposite sex."

So does Mr. Deo have a daughter he'd like to marry off to some gay guy? Is that what he's really proposing here? Think of it, imagine all the fat chicks who will finally have the man of their dreams. Oh, there won't be much sex involved, but their houses will be nicely decorated, and their wardrobe will rival those of the skinny girls.

Or, let's take this a different direction: could I have all the gay couples line up so we can match you up with another lesbian couple? We'll create 2 bearded marriages, and all 4 individuals can then enjoy the rights and benefits afforded to married couples....oh, except for the fact that they can't actually take care of the person that they love.

Posted by: keltic | Jan 7, 2010 2:30:56 PM

WTF? Why is it that organizations such as NOM, or FOF are clearly operating under the pretense that Civil Unions and Domestic partnerships are good enough for us, now, when they have historically opposed them; and if they remain the rule of law, they would continue to oppose them?! Far too few people are really being sold the unequivocal facts that CUs and DPs are, in fact, a Second Class status, and that CUs (which have been proven not to work, despite opposition groups which claim that we should invest the time to make them work!*) are not only a separate-but-equal status, but that they are SEPARATE-BUT-(UN)EQUAL!

And, I find it offensive that any judge would dare say that we have equal marriage rights to marry someone of the opposite sex!

* Actually, many companies are employing a Fed. statute that allows them not to recognize CUs and DPs as being almost-equal to marriage within states that recognize CUs.

Posted by: Wade MacMorrighan | Jan 7, 2010 5:30:17 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails