RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/18/2010

Video: And now comes the part of #CPAC10 where brave soldiers are negligently diminished

by Jeremy Hooper


VIDEO: Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Supporters’ Press Conference at CPAC [HRC]

**SEE ALSO: The "research" packs that were passed out at the event:

(You'll have to zoom in -- bottom leftish)

CMR DADT "research"

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I watch them, and wonder if they are aware of how entirely inconsequential that they, and their hollow rhetoric, are. We know that they keep spouting their contempt for all things LGBT, because that is what their indenture contract with their (corporate and or billionaire) owners requires. But even they must be aware of the fact that they are not resonating with enough Americans to matter.

DADT is just one of the anti-gay rants that they regularly visit, and, they have had more success with other hatemongering against LGBTs, but they still keep sounding the same hollow tones against DADT that don't seem to be earning them any new adherents. Is it just to squeeze more green out of the faithful??

Posted by: Dick Mills | Feb 18, 2010 10:31:18 PM

"homosexsheealuhty!"

LOL.

Posted by: Rodg | Feb 19, 2010 12:08:44 AM

On one hand, these people are deadly serious and are a threat to honorable men and women in uniform. On the other hand, they're hi-freaking-larious. Their transparent agenda and their rankling use of fear-words actually had me laughing by the end.

Posted by: DN | Feb 19, 2010 9:10:20 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails