RECENT  POSTS:  » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open » Video: 'Ex-gay' speaker at upcoming ERLC summit equates talking to gay people with talking to cancer patients » GLAAD: Mainstream media is catching on to NOM's broader agenda » FRC's Values Voter Summit puts anti-gay bakers on a marriage panel; so we won, basically » GOP front group NOM raising money for a GOP US Senate  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/02/2010

79 pages of needless hostility

by Jeremy Hooper

You've surely already heard by now about the D.C. marriage equality foes' decision to file an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court, in hopes of stopping Wednesday's issuance of marriage licenses. But for those of you who like your attempts to screw equality to come in thick and legalese-laden packages, we can now bring you the full SCOTUS filing. Enjoy the waste of time and trees:


SCOTUS filing -- DC marriage foes

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Someone explain to me, now, precisely WHY these folks believe that they have an absolute and unquestionable right to vote on every issue, or every citizen that they like? Moreover, why aren't they owning up to the FACT that it's based in religious prejudice, instead of what civil law mandates?!

Posted by: Wade MacMorrighan | Mar 2, 2010 2:49:58 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails