RECENT  POSTS:  » GLAAD: Why would we silence unwittingly helpful voices like yours, Peter LaBarbera? » Photo: NOM fully (and finally) owning its wholly faith-driven root » Our winning movement wins another one: Judge says Ohio must recognize out-of-state marriages » Video: Tony Perkins is pissssssssssssed at Chick-fil-a » You must be so proud of this headline, @ChristianPost » READ: Full page 'NY Times' ad pleas to supposedly refreshing new Pope: Take strong stand for LGBT youth » Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth, and—activists who try to strip certain citizens of certain civil rights?! » Here we go again: Anti-equality activist going after Christian publisher for simply publishing an LGBT-affirming view » Photo: Equal marriage in Utah is like—stepping on a sailor's face?! » NOM co-founder warns Christians of the supposed gay-initiated perils that lie ahead  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/02/2010

79 pages of needless hostility

by Jeremy Hooper

You've surely already heard by now about the D.C. marriage equality foes' decision to file an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court, in hopes of stopping Wednesday's issuance of marriage licenses. But for those of you who like your attempts to screw equality to come in thick and legalese-laden packages, we can now bring you the full SCOTUS filing. Enjoy the waste of time and trees:


SCOTUS filing -- DC marriage foes

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Someone explain to me, now, precisely WHY these folks believe that they have an absolute and unquestionable right to vote on every issue, or every citizen that they like? Moreover, why aren't they owning up to the FACT that it's based in religious prejudice, instead of what civil law mandates?!

Posted by: Wade MacMorrighan | Mar 2, 2010 2:49:58 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails