RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/02/2010

79 pages of needless hostility

by Jeremy Hooper

You've surely already heard by now about the D.C. marriage equality foes' decision to file an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court, in hopes of stopping Wednesday's issuance of marriage licenses. But for those of you who like your attempts to screw equality to come in thick and legalese-laden packages, we can now bring you the full SCOTUS filing. Enjoy the waste of time and trees:


SCOTUS filing -- DC marriage foes

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Someone explain to me, now, precisely WHY these folks believe that they have an absolute and unquestionable right to vote on every issue, or every citizen that they like? Moreover, why aren't they owning up to the FACT that it's based in religious prejudice, instead of what civil law mandates?!

Posted by: Wade MacMorrighan | Mar 2, 2010 2:49:58 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails