RECENT  POSTS:  » Report: US District judge won't deny justice to gay Coloradans; might delay it, though » AFA to POTUS: End your 'love affair with homosexuality,' give anti-gay Christians entitlement instead » Congressional right wing's right-side-of-history whip count: 8–271 » NOM, Manhattan Declaration turn Unitarian's anti-slavery, anti-war into pro-discrimination anthem » Matt Barber and Peter LaBarbera tease America's coming anti-gay street revolts » FRC writer: We're not all the same, 'gay agenda' is 'dangerous for the wellbeing of this nation' » NBC analyst Tony Dungy says he wouldn't have drafted Michael Sam » NOM becomes even more of a generalized anti-LGBT animus organization » Sure, NOM—I'll play your game!! » Bryan Fischer: POTUS 'stood on the graves' of Malaysia Air victims 'to promote the legitimacy of sexual deviancy'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/04/2010

That pesky Human Rights Act: 1988 edition

by Jeremy Hooper

This week, we're seeing the far-right lash out against the public responsibilities/obligations provided by the D.C. Human Rights Act, acting as if these civil concerns trump religious people (and specifically Catholic's) supposed "religious freedom."

Some things never change:

8/4/1988 -- Tribune Media Services
201003041358-1

The far-right's threats never went to the Supreme Court. And now? We'll see...

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Of course gay rights trump religion. Religion is a lifestyle choice whereas gay is inborn.

Posted by: marsmannetje | Mar 4, 2010 4:13:27 PM

I didn't read the byline at first. I started to wonder who could spew this sort of nonsense, but then I saw Pat Buchanan's name, and the Force came back into balance.

Posted by: GDad | Mar 5, 2010 8:46:09 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails