RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/04/2010

That pesky Human Rights Act: 1988 edition

by Jeremy Hooper

This week, we're seeing the far-right lash out against the public responsibilities/obligations provided by the D.C. Human Rights Act, acting as if these civil concerns trump religious people (and specifically Catholic's) supposed "religious freedom."

Some things never change:

8/4/1988 -- Tribune Media Services
201003041358-1

The far-right's threats never went to the Supreme Court. And now? We'll see...

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Of course gay rights trump religion. Religion is a lifestyle choice whereas gay is inborn.

Posted by: marsmannetje | Mar 4, 2010 4:13:27 PM

I didn't read the byline at first. I started to wonder who could spew this sort of nonsense, but then I saw Pat Buchanan's name, and the Force came back into balance.

Posted by: GDad | Mar 5, 2010 8:46:09 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails