RECENT  POSTS:  » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open » Video: 'Ex-gay' speaker at upcoming ERLC summit equates talking to gay people with talking to cancer patients » GLAAD: Mainstream media is catching on to NOM's broader agenda » FRC's Values Voter Summit puts anti-gay bakers on a marriage panel; so we won, basically » GOP front group NOM raising money for a GOP US Senate  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/04/2010

That pesky Human Rights Act: 1988 edition

by Jeremy Hooper

This week, we're seeing the far-right lash out against the public responsibilities/obligations provided by the D.C. Human Rights Act, acting as if these civil concerns trump religious people (and specifically Catholic's) supposed "religious freedom."

Some things never change:

8/4/1988 -- Tribune Media Services
201003041358-1

The far-right's threats never went to the Supreme Court. And now? We'll see...

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Of course gay rights trump religion. Religion is a lifestyle choice whereas gay is inborn.

Posted by: marsmannetje | Mar 4, 2010 4:13:27 PM

I didn't read the byline at first. I started to wonder who could spew this sort of nonsense, but then I saw Pat Buchanan's name, and the Force came back into balance.

Posted by: GDad | Mar 5, 2010 8:46:09 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails