RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: Fed. judge strikes Alabama marriage ban; no stay on ruling » Derisively remembering when full equality was in 'Jeopardy!' » When all else fails, demand your letters are capitalized » Major Iowa caucus player calls on next President to 'politely reject unjust SCOTUS opinions' » Photo: Supreme Court's Thomas poses with NOM's cofounder, major equality opponent » Wait, even NewsMax is now pushing back against anti-gay spin?! » Deflating the anti-gay right's latest 'gotcha!' » POTUS hails marriage equality in State of the Union speech » Well I expected this headline from NOM eventually... » Bret Baier: Legatus Magazine's anti-gay 'cure' doesn't 'seem to line up with the loving, accepting Church that I know'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/04/2010

That pesky Human Rights Act: 1988 edition

by Jeremy Hooper

This week, we're seeing the far-right lash out against the public responsibilities/obligations provided by the D.C. Human Rights Act, acting as if these civil concerns trump religious people (and specifically Catholic's) supposed "religious freedom."

Some things never change:

8/4/1988 -- Tribune Media Services
201003041358-1

The far-right's threats never went to the Supreme Court. And now? We'll see...

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Of course gay rights trump religion. Religion is a lifestyle choice whereas gay is inborn.

Posted by: marsmannetje | Mar 4, 2010 4:13:27 PM

I didn't read the byline at first. I started to wonder who could spew this sort of nonsense, but then I saw Pat Buchanan's name, and the Force came back into balance.

Posted by: GDad | Mar 5, 2010 8:46:09 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails