RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/30/2010

3 out of 4 SCOTUS watchers agree: Focus on the Family's is the 'non-starter' position

by Jeremy Hooper

Focus on the Family might consider an openly LGB Supreme Court nominee to be a "non-starter," regardless of merit or qualification. However, a new WaPo/ABC News poll shows just how out of touch this organization is when it comes to the majority of Americans.

71% say "gay or lesbian" is no factor, 4% say it's a positive, and only 25% say it's a negative (and only 22% say it's a strong negative):

Screen Shot 2010-04-30 At 11.39.42 Am-1
Washington Post-ABC News Poll -- SCOTUS

So keep it up, FOtF. Barking such unabashedly homo-hostile job requirements might still sound advantageous within your Colorado Springs walls, but don't be surprised if it's your own stance (and public support) that ultimately gets "Borked."

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails