RECENT  POSTS:  » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/12/2010

Subtracting 8 in '10: 86ed

by Jeremy Hooper

There will be no Prop 8 repeal on this year's ballot:

GROUP WORKING FOR 2010 PROPOSITION 8 REPEAL FAILS TO COLLECT ENOUGH SIGNATURES TO QUALIFY FOR BALLOT [Towle]

Effort now turns to 2012, which is what most LGBT groups wanted in the first place. You know, other than not having to pause our lives to fight this needless and offensive basic rights battle at all, which is really what all Americans should be entitled by virtue of his or her citizenship.

But hey, (those who were made) beggars (via majority tyranny) can't be choosers.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails