RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/30/2010

A glass house vs. a White House

by Jeremy Hooper

MaggieMaggie Gallagher is someone who, through her prominent and self-determined work to stop America's gay couples from equal rights, stubbornly insists on misrepresenting certain situations (i.e. the Ocean Grove, NJ, tax matter) so that it makes her anti-equality fight seem more palatable.

Maggie Gallagher is someone who often refuses to process what her opposition actually says about church/state separation, children not being an acceptable basis for denying marriage equality, gays' desire to stifle churches, or any number of matters involving CIVIL marriage in this nation, instead framing discriminatory campaigns around her Catholic faith and her personal belief in there being only one kind of acceptable family.

Maggie Gallagher's NOM put out one of the the most tragicomic political ads to ever hit this country when they released their roundly mocked "Gathering Storm."

Maggie Gallagher is frequently patronizing in her rhetoric, positioning the brunt body blows that come with her work as being "loving" and "christian" and "moral" and "God's truth."

Maggie Gallagher is frequently condescending in her talking points, referring to our unions as "this gay marriage thing" or reducing our desire to that of "two dudes" who want to get hitched.

Maggie Gallagher should really look inward before casting stones:

President Obama is a man whom Americans see as easy-going, likable, honest and straightforward, polls show.

But he is leading his party and our country into a tragicomic fall by his stubborn refusal to acknowledge, process or credit the point of view of those who disagree with him. Obama is patronizing and condescending in a way that only Harvard can explain or tolerate. (And I say that as a Yalie myself!)

OBAMA: HE KNEW HE WAS RIGHT [UExpress via Yahoo!]

Honestly, there is no one person in politics whose work embodies Maggie's claims much more than Maggie's own anti-equality actions! Harvard, Yale, Podunk College? Whatever. It doesn't take a doctorate to see that Maggie's own anti-marriage workshop demands that applicants obtain an advanced degree in both intellectual stubbornness and condescending morality mappage.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails