RECENT  POSTS:  » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open » Video: 'Ex-gay' speaker at upcoming ERLC summit equates talking to gay people with talking to cancer patients » GLAAD: Mainstream media is catching on to NOM's broader agenda » FRC's Values Voter Summit puts anti-gay bakers on a marriage panel; so we won, basically » GOP front group NOM raising money for a GOP US Senate  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/16/2010

No, Gary: Peter, gay 'non-starters' and discrimination have *everything* to do with *any* FOtF discussion!

by Jeremy Hooper

Despite Focus on the Family's Tom Minnery giving his initial comment on the subject to Peter LaBarbera EXCLUSIVELY, his colleague Gary Schneeberger is criticizing this writer for mentioning P.L. in connection with the group's repudiation of their past comments on gay SCOTUS nominees. This from a Focus on the Family Facebook site focused on reaching millennials:

Screen Shot 2010-04-16 At 12.39.29 Pm-1
*Feel free to go "fan" and leave your own (firm but fair) comments: Rising Voice [Facebook]

Okay, (a): Yes, both Peter LaBarbera and Gary Glenn did in fact bring about this new public statement. Sure, they might have delivered if someone else had asked first. But the fact remains that Peter and Gary dug for it, and Peter and Gary were granted it.

(b) It really doesn't matter who or what elicited the comment. The fact remains that Focus on the Family is now on record calling certain judges "non-starters" simply because they were born to love in a certain way.

(c) If FOtF wants to distance itself from LaBarbera, then they can issue a clarification. But while Peter has sent around a press release applauding the organization, Focus has let it all go out unchecked. Their comm. guy saying that P.L. "has nothing to do with this discussion" is patently false. Peter, to his credit, is the one who CREATED this current discussion!

(d) Millennials, like all people, deserve to know these kinds of things about FOtF. Because regardless of the topic at hand (This millennial outreach is currently focused on sex trafficking), the fact remains that shunning LGBT people is at the heart of Focus on the Family's mission (even if they call it "love."). Schneeberger may say that he has ADD. His employer has ascribed FAR WORSE afflictions to me and my family (i.e. suggesting that I have a "homosexual problem")!

Game = On.

***

**UPDATE: Schneeberger says he actually meant that Peter has nothing to do with the discussion on sex trafficking, not with the SCOTUS discussion. So it looks like he's not trying to distance the group from LaBarbera -- he's just trying to distance Focus on the Family's demonstrably discriminatory work from their other goals.

Not gonna happen. Can't happen. Shouldn't happen!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails