RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


Forty years of asking 'Then why aren't kids a marital requirement?!'

by Jeremy Hooper

One thing that constantly astounds us is the familiarity of the arguments used both for and against us throughout time. The years change, but arguments that hinge on things like reproduction and child protection stay the same.

Journey back with us to a time when a man named Brady was on first-run TV, an iPad was just a feminine product that had been Maxed out, and gays were celebrating Stonewall's first anniversary by laying the first stones on the path toward Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire, D.C., and the world:

Pasadena Star-News, 8/20/1970

A column that brings to mind one big question: Did ten-year-old Maggie Gallagher visit Pasadena in August of 1970?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails