RECENT  POSTS:  » Ruth Institute (former NOM affiliate): Same-sex marriage is as much of a wedge as interracial marriage bans » NOM finally admitting that marriage amendments are, in fact, bans » Kentucky's big anti-LGBT org hopes to pray away a fair court ruling on civil marriage » Iowa's governor sponsoring anti-gay Family Leader summit? » Head of Virginia's top anti-gay org: One mean email proves 'the left' is sexist, intolerant » Video: Ohio should be so lucky to have married couples as adorable as George Henry » GLAAD: Q&A with former 'ex-gay' activist Yvette Schneider: 'I’ve never met an 'ex-gay' man I thought was not still attracted to men' » Head of Virginia's anti-equality org: 'open season to discriminate against anyone who believes that children deserve a mom and a dad' » Force behind Virginia's marriage ban ably demonstrates animus behind it » NOM to show rest of world its impressive ability to exacerbate loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/07/2010

Forty years of asking 'Then why aren't kids a marital requirement?!'

by Jeremy Hooper

One thing that constantly astounds us is the familiarity of the arguments used both for and against us throughout time. The years change, but arguments that hinge on things like reproduction and child protection stay the same.

Journey back with us to a time when a man named Brady was on first-run TV, an iPad was just a feminine product that had been Maxed out, and gays were celebrating Stonewall's first anniversary by laying the first stones on the path toward Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire, D.C., and the world:

Pasadena Star-News, 8/20/1970
201004071402-1

A column that brings to mind one big question: Did ten-year-old Maggie Gallagher visit Pasadena in August of 1970?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails