RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/12/2010

McCain 2010: Because it's only your rights he wants to send to the glue factory

by Jeremy Hooper

Back when he voted against the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) invoked "Armageddon" and "death knells" when referring to the the kind of pro-equality progress that would lead him to support a version of an FMA:




And of course Sen. McCain, unlike his wife and daughter, supports local marriage bans whenever they arise. He supported Prop 8, which rolled back an already-granted right, He supported the anti-gay amendment in his own state of Arizona. Plain and simple: He doesn't support same-sex marriage in any way, shape, or non-gender-specific licensing form. In fact, during the '08 presidential campaign, the senior senator fully locked down his resistance so that it also included civil unions.

So why do we rehash all this now? Well, because the senator is facing his toughest re-election contest in years. And to get a leg hoof up on challenger J.D. Hayworth, McCain actually has the nerve to mock his opponent's marriage stance:


(H/t: Towle, J.M.G)

Okay, so no, as far as we know, Sarah Palin's Golden Ticket has never invoked sexual equestrianism in his anti-marriage stances. But honestly: So what?! At the end of the day, he still stands against basic civil equality for LGB people. The fact that he hasn't resorted to nutty verbal flourish to embolden (or weaken) his stance doesn't make his position any more commendable!

This would be kind of like a Senator who vocally opposed healthcare reform criticizing a TEA Partier for dressing the exact same stance up in a Hitler mustache. Yes, the latter is visually uglier, and the discourse more damaging. But one doesn't get a cookie simply because he or she was less kooky! If Sen. McCain truly wanted to distance himself from his potential successor, he would care less about the horse and more about the untenable position that continues to stink up the GOP's stable. Until he does that, his attempts to make political hay out of gay people's marriages is going to get a big neigh nay from us.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails